oldmanintheskydidntdoit
Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006
|
| Quote (supersport @ Sep. 19 2007,08:20) | so tell me....the claim was made that lamarckism was disproven long ago....but funny, I've seen no such disproof. Some dude cut off the tails of a bunch of mice and then bred them but this is a strawman account of what Lamarck was arguing for, that adaptations resulted from an interaction of the organism and the environment, and that internally-generated adaptations could be inherited. He never claimed that assaults on an organism could be inherited.
Now -- someone please step up to the plate and show me where the scumbags in evolutionary science over the past century have had the balls to disprove Lamarck by way of controlled experiment. This would be so EASY to test and disprove. Now show me. |
Troll.
Answer some of your own outstanding questions before posing more.
| Quote | | the scumbags in evolutionary science |
As opposed to the scumbags in real-estate sitting bored in a cubicle? Do you have a particularly unsatisfying life SuperSport? Education is the way forward, break out of that cubicle.
Why don't you instead prove that Lamarck is right, instead of asking us to prove he's wrong.
After that's done that I'll prove unicorns don't exist.
--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK
if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings
|
