RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (21) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Challenge to Evolutionists< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 19 2007,05:29   

Quote (snorkild @ Sep. 19 2007,05:16)
Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,19:23)
Dutch astronomer named Olaf Roemer

Danish astronomer named Ole Rømer.

Why does Setterfield exclude Huygen's (late 17th century) figure based on Rømer's data: 220,000 km/sec?

Why does he ignore Bradley's (1728) figure: 298,000 km/sec?

And Fizeau's (1849): 313,000 km/sec?

Cherry-picking?

Not only that, but at those levels of changes we should be able to observe it changing year to year.

Yet we don't.

SuperSport, why is that?

Supersport, you never got back to me about the bacteria not eating toxic stuff whereas humans do, and this is your "explanation" as to why genomic degeneration only affects humans. I pointed out bacteria can thrive on so called "toxic waste" and you've yet to comment on that fact.

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
  603 replies since Sep. 17 2007,22:32 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (21) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]