supersport
Posts: 158
Joined: Aug. 2007
|
| Quote (jeannot @ Sep. 18 2007,17:24) | | Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,16:37) | | prove it...I need to see where it was lamarckism was proven wrong. |
Actually, it didn't need to be proven wrong, because it never was a scientific theory. Lamark produced blind assertions and never submitted them to experiments.
So it's up to you. Show us those acquired traits being inherited? Bronzed skin? Scars? Fractures? Hair cut? Will your children be more muscular if you practice body-building? |
Well who said this?
"You seem to support Lamarkism. Too bad it's been proven wrong long ago"
Why is it up to ME to prove or disprove Lamarckism -- don't you think 100 years of science should have accomplished something like this by now? The purposeful generation/heritability of traits is EASY to test. Don't blame me for science being full of a bunch of chickens.
|
