RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (21) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Challenge to Evolutionists< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
jeannot



Posts: 1201
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 18 2007,15:50   

Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,15:40)
Quote (jeannot @ Sep. 18 2007,15:37)
 
Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,15:30)
 
Quote (jeannot @ Sep. 18 2007,15:28)
   
Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,15:14)
edit: I looked that up...there is no mutation here....the pigmentation comes as a result of a hormone binding to a protein.   The mutation is an inference, not something scientifically verified.

The mutation has been identified. I attended Sean Carrol's recent conference in Uppsala. His results are probably published, if not in his book.

And you do know how proteins are produced, don't you?

show me a link where a mutation was observed, which then altered pigmentation....just curious.  He's vague in his book about this.

I'm sure you can do that yourself.

I'm curious too: your think that pigmentation can't be altered by a mutation?

the question is whether or not this pigmentation will lead to a more "fit" organism.

A male fly with this pigmentation can court females.

Another question: do you think that pigmentation never influences reproductive success?

  
  603 replies since Sep. 17 2007,22:32 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (21) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]