supersport
Posts: 158
Joined: Aug. 2007
|
| Quote (Albatrossity2 @ Sep. 18 2007,15:39) | | Quote (supersport @ Sep. 18 2007,15:29) | "Oh, and another thing, the spine appeared in response to predation, which is not the same thing as "mental processes".
How is it that the environment (predators in this case) can somehow influence a flea to create a new spine without the flea (or his parent) sensing the predator? What do you .think does this sensing?
Fish do this all the time: upon an environmental chnage many fish can change colors on a dime. Cichlids are notorious for this. How does this happen without some sort of sensory device to not only ackowledge the new environment, but also to signal the necessary morphological changes? |
Crikey, you are a serious basket case. Does it make sense to you that mental processes can be involved, but are NOT SUFFICIENT to make things happen? Does it make sense to you that color-changing in fish involves neurological processing, but is NOT sufficient? Do you think that the mind, by itself (i.e. without the fish, or its chromatophores, or the rest of its "materialistic" body) can change color?
You claimed that mental processes generate life instantly. Where is the evidence for that? Put up, or shut up.
Thanks again for ignoring this question. |
blah blah blah...is there a point in there? Either morphological variation arises accidentally by way of mutations or it doesn't. You cannot prove that it does, yet I can prove that it doesn't -- which I just did.
|
