RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (37) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: No reason for a rift between science and religion?, Skeptic's chance to prove his claims.< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Louis



Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 30 2007,10:55   

Quote (Arden Chatfield @ Oct. 30 2007,15:12)
Quote (Richardthughes @ Oct. 30 2007,08:30)
Quote (Reciprocating Bill @ Oct. 30 2007,06:36)
 
Quote (Henry J @ Oct. 29 2007,23:55)
 
Quote
Is language technology? It certainly augments cognition..


That's an interesting question. Offhand I'd say yes. If technology = study of techniques = study of ways of doing things then language would fit.

Using my dictionary: technology = applied science, or technical method of achieving a practical purpose.

Imnsho, language fits that definition, too. At least the second part of it, and maybe the first.

Henry

Is bipedal walking a technology?

Human speech likely has a significant evolutionary basis, so has components that aren't analogous to acquired/learned/culturally invented techniques.

Vocabulary was certainly created.

Just for the record, I have really looked at my hands.

No but dude, have you ever, you know really, really looked at them. They're like, you know, man. I mean nothing can touch my hands except for themselves, you know.



Booooooooooooooooooooong.

Snoogans

Louis

--------------
Bye.

  
  1091 replies since Aug. 06 2007,07:39 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (37) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]