RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (37) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: No reason for a rift between science and religion?, Skeptic's chance to prove his claims.< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Reciprocating Bill



Posts: 4265
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 29 2007,21:42   

Quote ("Rev Dr" Lenny Flank @ Aug. 29 2007,22:31)
Therefore, any viewpoint that limits itself exclusively to trying to answer them, simply cannot be in conflict with science, since science doesn't have diddley to say about answering those questions.

That said, we can operationalize the classification of kinds of "mate selection processes," empirically investigate the success rates of each sort of process, and thereby offer (by scientific means) "second order" assistance with the decision process: not conclusions, but help with selection of the process by which conclusions are attained.

Surely that is squat, if not diddly.

--------------
Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be.

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you."
- David Foster Wallace

"Here’s a clue. Snarky banalities are not a substitute for saying something intelligent. Write that down."
- Barry Arrington

  
  1091 replies since Aug. 06 2007,07:39 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (37) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]