csadams
Posts: 124
Joined: June 2007
|
| Quote (Ftk @ Jan. 03 2008,15:45) | | Quote (csadams @ Jan. 03 2008,15:23) | | Quote (Albatrossity2 @ Jan. 03 2008,14:40) | | Now, how about those peer reviewers who looked at Walt Brown's book? How many times can you skirt that question? |
FtK, why are you more interested in bestiality than in answering this simple question? |
Because it was posed in order to change the subject, which I am not going to do. That question has absolutely nothing to do with the conversation we have been having for the past 2 days. That question was brought from an entirely different thread. I am determined to stick to this subject as long as needed because I am not a liar, and I have relayed everything about this incident accurately.
You people are constantly saying that no one from our side defends themselves because they are undefendable. So, here I am, and here I'll stay. In fact, I think PZ owes me an apology. His name calling attack was completely uncalled for. |
You, FtK? Not change a subject?
You claim such familiarity with and understanding of Brown's work, yet you can't be bothered to take the little time it should require to find his statement that his work has been peer-reviewed.
Perhaps if you'd come up with that reference, it would help show that you're "not a liar."
Or you could admit that you know darn good and well that Brown hasn't submitted his work for peer review, and regain some smidgen of credibility.
Simple, really.
--------------
Stand Up For REAL Science!
|
