JohnW
Posts: 3217
Joined: Aug. 2006
|
| Quote ("Rev Dr" Lenny Flank @ Aug. 07 2007,17:15) | | Quote (Albatrossity2 @ Aug. 06 2007,07:37) | | Perhaps they don't really have a coherent marketing strategy for this thing, but that would be surprising, since marketing is definitely their strong suit. |
I'm still sticking with the hypothesis that this thing was designed (pardon the pun) to serve as their textbook for "teach the controversy", and was written BEFORE "teach the controversy" died a gruesome death in Kansas and Ohio and Georgia.
Now that they are stuck with a "textbook" that they can't teach, they're just trying to sell it to somebody, anybody, to recoup the losses.
After the way they left the Dover Dolts twisting in the wind, even the halfwits at Discovery Institute must realize that no sane school board will ever trust them again. |
If I was more of a conspiracy theorist, I'd think that nothing causes contribution checks to be written faster than another court defeat at the hands of a pinko judge (like, ahem, Bush-appointee Jones). And as the book was ready to roll anyway, and there's bound to be some school district somewhere which is dumb enough to use it...
I'm not a conspiracy theorist, and this scenario assumes the IDiots and iDIots know what they're doing, but still...
--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers
There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"... The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG
|
