Albatrossity2
Posts: 2780
Joined: Mar. 2007
|
| Quote (hooligans @ April 23 2008,11:42) | My questions, Paul, should only take a second to answer. Would you mind? I'm curious.
Just look up the board for full questions. To summarize:
1: How is Cowan doing with EE? Are you giving him a new set of texts, given the vast quantity of errors in the 1st edition?
2: Flowering plants. What's up witht the new research that appears to cast doubt on the wording you use in EE regarding their evolution? Will you incorporate some of these ideas? Why or why not?
Thanks |
Yeah, questions like hooligans'. Some of which date back to July...
Or you could even tell us who did the "research" that was used to document the statement in EE about the "many modern textbooks" that still parrot Haeckel, and how they managed to completely miss looking at many modern textbooks?
Or, since you were also researching this topic yourself recently, if any research at all was done prior to the writing and publication of the book?
Or why Chien was still listed in EE as a "marine paleobiologist" when his credentials in that area were shown to be slim-to-none by Forrest and Gross way back in 2004?
I'm sure you have answers to those questions, but I'm also pretty sure we will never see them here.
--------------
Flesh of the sky, child of the sky, the mind
Has been obligated from the beginning
To create an ordered universe
As the only possible proof of its own inheritance.
- Pattiann Rogers
|
