IanBrown_101
Posts: 927
Joined: April 2007
|
| Quote (Ftk @ June 25 2007,00:45) | | I’ll tell ya one thing....it would be one heck of a lot easier to come up with an explanation for the Noah scenario that to believe that a freakin’ blob is responsible for everything we observe in nature today. |
Yes, because all that evidence over 150 years in practically all fields of science can easily be dismissed by the cunning argument about how a boat that couldn't even come close to holding all the animals and would have sank right away into flood waters that would have had a tricky time getting there managed to do it all because of one man and his family.
Remember though FtK, I'm being polite, I may take slight jabs at you, but this is the same kind of barbed remark I get from you, and you did it first, so no calling foul. I would like to propose a deal, I will read whatever stuff you send me IF and only if you can give me an explanation, or at least send me to somewhere that can (and I don't just mean "read this book, it's in there somewhere) explain how the Egyptians, Assyrians and all the other civilisations apparently contemporary with the flood were not drowned, and also managed to avoid being noticed by the all seeing god.
--------------
I'm not the fastest or the baddest or the fatest.
You NEVER seem to address the fact that the grand majority of people supporting Darwinism in these on line forums and blogs are atheists. That doesn't seem to bother you guys in the least. - FtK
Roddenberry is my God.
|
