RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (341) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: UnReasonable Kansans thread, AKA "For the kids"< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Ftk



Posts: 2239
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 31 2007,07:51   

Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Dec. 31 2007,07:24)
Quote (Ftk @ Dec. 31 2007,07:21)
 
Quote
EDIT: Typos. And because I can.


Interesting point, and an extremely irritating one for me at the moment.

I'm deemed a lying, cheating "creationist" because I erase 3 silly posts that were content free.  Now, I'm untrustworthy because evidently *all* creationists erase things from the net that they don't want seen.  They're lying, theiving rascals.

But, here I am wanting to link to *2 1/2* friggin years of blood, sweat and tears, pouring over information, and writing thousands of posts on topics covering almost every subject in this debate, and THEY ARE GONE!!!, GONE!!!!,  GONE!!!!  Makes me physically ill to think about it due to the amount of time put into those posts.

Now, I want *every* *single* *one* of *you* to do the right thing and contact Jack Krebs and get him to fix that problem NOW.  Otherwise, never *ever*, *ever* bring up some silly accusation that things just "disappear" from "creationist" sites.

What scientists peer reviewed Walt's book FTK?

If the data at kcfs was so important to you, you should have saved it off yourself. Simple as.

EDIT: It's almost as if you expect somebody else to put time, money, energy into preserving something that you find useful yet you don't feel the need to contribute at all. Do you know how much it costs to run a busy forum? Bandwidth is not free you know!
Why don't you ask Jack for an archive of the site, pay for some web-hosting to put it back up on, maintain and moderate the site and then *poof* your years of hard work are back online.

Right there is your answer as to why it would be stupid for Walt to ever participate in a thorough debate on-line.  It could just disappear.  

The written word is the only way to go.  

And, for the record, I'd be a *fool* to give you the names of people who peer-reviewed Walt's work.  You'd pick them off one by one and ridicule them and their credentials regardless.  

You'd also probably contact them and tell them they are a disgrace to the human race for having the audacity to review pseudoscience.

You are a wall, OM, not a bridge.  Go away.

--------------
"Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths"  -forastero

  
  10202 replies since Mar. 17 2007,23:38 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (341) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]