Ftk
Posts: 2239
Joined: Mar. 2007
|
Wes, your use of the term "IDC" is merely the tip of the iceberg in regard to the lack of integrity that oozes from your pores. You can use your examples in the textbook "Of Pandas and People" until you turn blue in the face, but it's *entirely* irrelevant, IMHO. Who gives a flying fig if it was copied verbatim...the only relationship between creation science and ID is the fact that both factions believe there is an intelligent source responsible for our existence. And, if you twist the meaning of the "C" to take a slightly different definition of "creation", that is just as confusing and dishonest.
There is not a creation scientist alive who would agree that ID = creation science. In fact, the majority of them take issue with ID for a variety of reasons.
If you *still* cannot grasp the different between creation science and intelligent design, then the time you've spent reading millions of books on the topic has been a monumental waste.
--------------
"Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths" -forastero
|
