IanBrown_101
Posts: 927
Joined: April 2007
|
After having two comments passed to my great surprise, FTK asks for a truce because she thinks she's pissing me off. Uh huh.
Linky.
My reply:
| Quote | Piss me off? My dear lady, you've only done that once (remmeber that stuff about WWII? That really did piss me off, and I've calmed down now, thank you).
However, when someone makes a claim about me (that I will just turn my back on any evidence provided) without any cause to (for example, after having not provided the evidence I specifically mentioned would affect me) I feel I am quite warrented to rebut such claims. Had you shown me a 87% (to pull a high number out) success rate for prophecies, or some advanced scientific knowlege in the bible they couldn't have known at the time, prayer studies that showed it made a difference, or a direct manifestation of the devine (note to readers, no, I am NOT saying I need direct contact with the big beardy man, this is ONE thing that would convince me) and I had sai "don't believe you" then you would be absolutely fine to say what you did.
However, I guess I accept your truce, although I suspect the truce will mean I am "no longer welcome" on here, no matter what you say, whether I agree or not.
As an aside, I know you don't publish comments on your FAQ's and that's fine, but you apparently DO adapt them to comments, so why no dice on my eye comment? You know, what is 100% of an eye, if it's a humans what are dogs eyes and pigeons eyes etc.? |
--------------
I'm not the fastest or the baddest or the fatest.
You NEVER seem to address the fact that the grand majority of people supporting Darwinism in these on line forums and blogs are atheists. That doesn't seem to bother you guys in the least. - FtK
Roddenberry is my God.
|
