JohnW
Posts: 3217
Joined: Aug. 2006
|
| Quote (Ftk @ July 11 2008,12:49) | | Quote | | It is only possible to hold to notions of hydroplates etc if one has never spent any time in the field whatsoever. That we can fix. |
Walt has spent an endless amount of time "in the field".
Now, E, you may be right about everything regarding the age of the earth...but, when you make blanket statements about theories I have no idea how much time you've alloted to studying, it's very hard for me to take just take your word that they're completely off base.
If you *really* want to educate folks, you're going to have to engage with the theorists themselves rather than participating in hysterical rants about your anger over their interpretations.
That is when folks like me will let our guard down and start trusting you a bit. |
Until Brown publishes a plausible mechanism for getting substantial chunks of the Earth into a nice stable belt, in the plane of the ecliptic, between Mars and Jupiter, in a period of a few weeks, with Earth continuing to be habitable during and after the process... (several other deal-breaking objections deleted for brevity)...
... there's nothing really to discuss. In biological terms, this is like demanding a hearing for the hypothesis that cows are flatworms.
--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers
There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"... Â The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG
|
