afdave
Posts: 1621
Joined: April 2006
|
K.e ... the only thing I will bother reading from you about Christianity in America is quotes from Founders or court cases from the founding era, complete with original (not secondary) sources. If you cannot supply those, then you're wasting your time. I will not read your biased revisionist speculators.
Oldman ... | Quote | | what's religion got to the with the age of the grand canyon, christinanity specifically? |
Religion has nothing to do with the age of the Grand Canyon, actually. The age of the Grand Canyon is a historical question and it so happens that the historical Book of Genesis (which you seem to view as strictly a religious book) has an account of the Global Flood of Noah, which, it turns out, explains the GC formation quite readily.
Ved ... | Quote | | In other words, mutations brought about alleles. It's so nice to agree during this holiday season. |
No. We don't agree. Can you prove that all alleles were originally caused by mutation? I don't think you can. I think you just assume that they were. Undoubtedly many were because they vary in some cases in only one or two nucleotide positions. But my view is that the original alleles were created.
Russell ... | Quote | | Really? The chromosome fusion thing checked out after all? |
Sorry. Make that ONE. We'll see about baboon dogs.
Russell ... | Quote | | What I have trouble understanding is how you think you can tell this bunch of folks - all of whom, with the possible/probable exception of the new creationist on the block - understand this material far better than you do, |
Some of them do, but some of them have demonstrated right here a woeful lack of basic knowledge as I have pointed out many times.
Besides, what is ambiguous about | Quote | | "The results of our first experiment provide evidence that a population's evolutionary potential is NOT limited after a bottleneck" |
??
How in the world can even a wishful thinker like yourself possibly twist this to mean something other than what it says?
Malum ... | Quote | | How are you defining 'Hi-tech' in these two statements? |
No other definition that the one you yourself would use. Just the usual plain vanilla every day definition.
--------------
A DILEMMA FOR THE COMMITTED NATURALIST
A Hi-tech alien spaceship lands on earth ... DESIGNED.
A Hi-tech alien rotary motor found in a cell ... NOT DESIGNED.
http://afdave.wordpress.com/....ess.com
|
