ericmurphy
Posts: 2460
Joined: Oct. 2005
|
| Quote (deadman_932 @ Dec. 11 2006,17:14) | | This is beyond stupid. It shows conclusively that Dave didn't read/comprehend the paper, as this bit that I quoted above...occurs in the Abstract leading INTO the article. I really have to wonder if Dave knows what <75 signifies in math. Dave...do you know what a population bottleneck is? Do you know which way the "less than / more than " signs face in each instance, with a number to the right of each? |
Dave does not understand what a genetic bottleneck is. For the longest time (perhaps even still), he denied that reducing all of humankind down to eight individuals was somehow not a genetic bottleneck.
Dave, if the human population pre-flood were as little as one hundred individuals, reducing it down to eight individuals would still be a genetic bottleneck.
--------------
2006 MVD award for most dogged defense of scientific sanity
"Atheism is a religion the same way NOT collecting stamps is a hobby." —Scott Adams
|
