argystokes
Posts: 766
Joined: Jan. 2006
|
| Quote (afdave @ Nov. 24 2006,07:42) | DM... | Quote | | Here's the deal, Daveychild....I'm not even going to give you HINTS, stupid, given that you claim to KNOW this material: |
Didn't think you would. Because you cannot.
| Quote | | You have at least one person asking if you want to bet them on this topic, stupid...care to take that up? |
Sure ... the bet is that you have no other PLAUSIBLE mechanism. Alladin's Lamp and Bippety Boppity Boo don't count. |
Since I'm the "at least one person," I'll take that as you accepting my bet. Now, how shall we judge if my mechanism is "plausible," and what are the terms of the bet? I've always liked BWE's idea of allowing a post on each other's blog.
My suggestion for determining plausibility is if more than 1 modern college-level textbook mentions it as plausible. You're welcome to come up with a counter offer, but it really should be objective, rather than whether or not you find it plausible.
--------------
"Why waste time learning, when ignorance is instantaneous?" -Calvin
|
