improvius
Posts: 807
Joined: Jan. 2006
|
| Quote (afdave @ Nov. 14 2006,13:18) | Improv... | Quote | | I'm still really, really curious about how Dave's concept of peer review is supposed to work without methodological naturalism. Do they just go over each other's work and say, "Nope, I can't figure out how to test this, either. Looks good!" |
Peer review with creationists works the same way as any other peer review with the notable exception that they are not so naive as to exclude the possibility of an Intelligent Creator, and they consider evidence from archaeologically proven historical documents such as the Bible to be evidence. |
So then, if I were to write a creationist research paper, and the only evidence I included was "because an angel told me so," then it should be viewed favorably in the peer review process, right?
Hmm, maybe I should switch careers...
--------------
| Quote (afdave @ Oct. 02 2006,18:37) | Many Jews were in comfortable oblivion about Hitler ... until it was too late.
Many scientists will persist in comfortable oblivion about their Creator ... until it is too late. |
|
