Jim_Wynne
Posts: 1208
Joined: June 2006
|
| Quote (afdave @ Nov. 14 2006,08:51) | Shirley... | Quote | You can provide no evidence whatsoever to support a charge of lying against Deadman.
| Quote | "THIS is what I said ...
PEOPLE LIKE DEADMAN WHO SAY THAT C14 DATING PROVES THINGS LIKE A PRE-FLOOD EGYPT AND PRE-HISTORIC MAN ARE ... LYING TO YOU !! " |
Prove it. Give a permalink to a single post in this or your previous thread where Deadman asserts that C14 dating provided proof of a pre-flood Egypt.
You cannot because he did not. |
OK. That's easy.
| Quote | Quote (deadman_932 @ Nov. 09 2006,22:58)
| Quote | | AFD..."What good evidence do you have that Egypt (or China) existed prior to about 2200 BC?" Simple question, Deadman. |
Coming from you, all questions and statements are simple, Dave...consider the source...you.
I mentioned some of the data in my previous post to you, Dave, including an explicit mention of radiocarbon dates on the Great Pyramid itself. There are far more -- many, many more. The Evidence for Sumer, Natufian and Assyrian, Babylonian groups etc, is very extensive, Dave.
(snip)
You can start with the radiometric 14C dates on the pyramids
(http://www.archaeology.org/9909/abstracts/pyramids.html )
that precede the flood date you believe in...and why there are no sediments showing a global flood affected them. |
Anything else you want to argue, Shirley?
********************************
Oh and Deadman ... still waiting to hear your SPECIFIC objections to Dr. Batten's article that I posted most recently. |
I've resisted coming into this thread because of a dislike for beating my head against the wall but...
Dave, do you understand the difference between evidence and proof? Sometimes a preponderance of the former may be characterized as being equal to the latter, but they're two different things. You asked Deadman for evidence, and he gave it to you, then you move the goalposts and claim that you were asking for proof. You'll never get anywhere if you don't understand the basic terms, or if you do understand them and prevaricate.
Since Dave has been backed into a corner wrt RC dating and is now attempting to escape via changing the subject, I suggest that we keep holding his feet to the fire on the subject at hand, and ignore his obfuscatory excursions into irrelevance. Let him either answer the questions he's trying to avoid, or drown in his own stupid flood.
--------------
Evolution is not about laws but about randomness on happanchance.--Robert Byers, at PT
|
