deadman_932
Posts: 3094
Joined: May 2006
|
| Quote | | And, as I never tire of pointing out, Dave has already admitted that no Bible he's ever read is inerrant ("it's close"), and he's not aware of any Bible in existence that actually is inerrant. |
That "selective amnesia" is an interestig part of Dave's pathology, beyond the obvious lies, quotemining, plagiarism.
Consider this analogy:
A guy gets stopped by the cops for running a red light. He goes to court saying " the cop said I could run red lights." The cop says that he did no such thing. The case is held over for hearings.
The guy is stopped 4 additional times, and tells the same cop " You said I could run red lights" The cases go to court and the cop proves he said the exact opposite by producing a video tape of each incident, with the lawbreaking driver acknowledging several times that the cop said "do NOT run red lights"
Would he be convicted? H3ll yes.
This is precisely analogous to Dave claiming I had said that Grand Staircase sediments could NOT be dated, when in fact I said the precise opposite FIVE TIMES, in increasingly irate terms.
I also GAVE him and Jon GAVE him specific examples of dating GS sediments , but he claims just a few pages back that I have been ambiguous about my position?
IF he's not serious, then he's being deliberately deceptive. If he IS serious about not understanding my position, then he's got some real problems mentally.
--------------
AtBC Award for Thoroughness in the Face of Creationism
|
