deadman_932
Posts: 3094
Joined: May 2006
|
alicejohn: For the last few months, I've been running that one around my mind. I also assume Dave has his venal motives for this little exercise and my conclusions were similar to yours.
(1)Dave is trying to impress the AiG/ICR with a compiled "version" that he feels is bulletproof so he can gain access to their lists of adherents/supporters or
(2) He's doing exactly what you described.
I don't believe this is for his own curiousity at all.
The good part is that I can't think of a single point that he's made against modern evolutionary theory that is firmly supported.
The corrollary to that is that he's been spectacularly unsuccessful in supporting his YEC claims. He can't even respond directly to the fact that literate cultures survived his flood date.
Anyway, I think you may be right, but the problem for Dave is that he's inept and doesn't have any real support from anything he's "learned " here...so does it matter, really? (I didn't mean that to sound rude, it's just the easiest way of saying he ain't got squat.)
**ack, I should add this, since you mentioned it. I agree about ericmurphy, (a) whether he has a Ph.D or not, since I'm sure he could get one if he wanted and (b) he's an asset under any circumstances.
--------------
AtBC Award for Thoroughness in the Face of Creationism
|
