BWE
Posts: 1902
Joined: Jan. 2006
|
| Quote (ScaryFacts @ Oct. 21 2006,15:20) | | Quote (BWE @ Oct. 21 2006,16:13) | | There is no record of a flood and there is verification of c-14 dating to 50,000 years i think. Also various other dating methods are actually calibrated using these scales. |
(Emphasis Added)
Which proves Dave's point--if c-14 dating is wrong, then it is used to "calibrate" the other methods, it propagates the error.
Don't you scientists know anything? |
No, c-14 is calibrated as are other decay related dating methods by using annually stratified phenomena which are cross-referenced by event between themselves. I appreciate you trying to help Davey out though.
Am I off my nut here or did I not just give a simple way to know that, if you are concerned with evidence, that Earth is much older than 6 or 7 thousand years?
Did that stuff just fly over the hedge? No one picked it up and Dave has not responded. Hmmm. 
I could go into quite a bit of detail into the cross calibration events and methods for counting annual deposits. Is it less fun than the genetic stuff? It it just chopped liver?
--------------
Who said that ev'ry wish would be heard and answered
When wished on the morning star
Somebody thought of that, and someone believed it
Look what it's done so far
The Daily Wingnut
|
