ericmurphy
Posts: 2460
Joined: Oct. 2005
|
| Quote (afdave @ Oct. 09 2006,10:10) | | OK fine. Then if we are going to allow discussion of things not verifiable in the lab in school science classes, then let's allow MANY non-verifiable things. Why is it that YOUR non-verifiable things can be discussed, but MINE cannot be? It's because you label mine "religious" and yours as "non-religious" or "scientific" and then wrap yourself in your revisionist idea of the establishment of religion clause. |
Here's why, Dave: because most claims the bible makes are provably false. It's not just a matter of them being unverifiable, it's a matter of them being wrong. The earth is not 6,000 years old, there never was a "global catastrophic flood," the Grand Canyon was not made in a year, continents didn't go zooming around the planet at hundreds of miles an hour, all life today is not descended from a few thousand individuals 4,500 years ago.
Sure, you believe all this crap is true, Dave. But it's only because you want to believe it. As everyone here has pointed out to you countless times, you have zero evidence to back up any of these claims, and science has entire libraries full of evidence to contradict them.
That's why your Bible nonsense doesn't get into the science classroom.
--------------
2006 MVD award for most dogged defense of scientific sanity
"Atheism is a religion the same way NOT collecting stamps is a hobby." —Scott Adams
|
