The Ghost of Paley
Posts: 1703
Joined: Oct. 2005
|
Arrrrgh! Either I forgot to click "post" or the software ate my latest reply to Eric. Well, let me try again.
| Quote | Quantum theory is simply inapplicable to the problem, Bill. You've got scale problems—in spades.
|
Eric, you do realise that the planck scale didn't drop from the heavens like nerdlinger manna? It was based on a cardhouse of assumptions; the merest puff will topple it. I'll show why later.
| Quote | | Not that I'm objecting to Louis cleaning your clock with his criticism of your understanding of electron orbitals. It's all very entertaining. But it's not advancing your cosmological model at all, because until you've established the applicability of your model to reality, it's dead in the water. |
No. Louis doesn't understand my model at all. First, he argued that my assumptions of orbital collapse were:
1) Nonsense; and
2) Unrelated to hybridisation.
(Good thing American and N.East Asian scientists know better, or else we wouldn't have such neato technology. But we're discussing the collapse of orbitals rather than the collapse of the British Empire, so I'll stay on topic.  )
So what did I do? I showed him a clear counterexample, and outlined the possible connection it had with my model. How does Louis respond? With a long-winded rehash on why the Kondo collapse and chemical bonding don't form a one-to-one correspondance to my model. No kidding. My theory attempts to fuse quantum and macroworld phenomenon, not glue them together. I'll show how tonight.
--------------
Dey can't 'andle my riddim.
|
