incorygible
Posts: 374
Joined: Feb. 2006
|
| Quote | | Quote |
I haven't read Dr Max's argument but if you think you have refuted the claim that the GULO gene does not support common descent you are sadly mistaken. |
You haven't even read the article and yet you disagree with me when I say I have refuted it?
Whoa! ... well, I was warned about this kind of stuff ... |
And we have firsthand knowledge of this kind of dishonesty and puffed up claims to moral and intellectual superiority. Despite the mistaken double negative ("refute" + "does not support"), it is clear to anyone with a modicum of literacy that Chris Hyland's claim is completely independent of the Max article.
| Quote | You guys cannot get your story straight. You say it's the similarities in the broken part, Jeannot says "you can't consider the loss of function alone as a valid evidence for common descent, because hundreds of mutations can break a gene."
Come on guys. Face it. Apes and humans have some striking similarities, I agree. Apes and humans both have what appears to be a broken GULO gene. So what? This does not prove Common Descent. |
Given the effort put into repeatedly correcting you on what evidence is at issue here (especially regarding the broken GULO gene), you are now either too dense or too dishonest to debate any further. Please feel free to claim glorious victory over the army of strawmen you erected on our behalf -- the sheer might of your lack of comprehension and disassembly was indeed quite overwhelming. Well done.
I'll now join the ranks of those too exasperated with your idiocy and disingenuity (which you'll no doubt interperet as the "strength" of your position) to take you at face value as someone capable of rational discourse. You have demonstrated unequivocally that you are not.
|
