ericmurphy
Posts: 2460 Joined: Oct. 2005
|
Quote (afdave @ May 16 2006,09:27) | The "evidence" that the earth is millions of years old is based on unwarranted assumptions which I will show. | Dave, you've been promising to tell us what our "unwarranted assumptions" are for weeks now. Are you going to deliver, or what? Given the number of unwarranted assumptions you yourself have made (like, it's the number of mutations that are important, not what the mutations are), it would be staggering to think you could find "unwarranted assumptions" about the age of the earth that have eluded tens of thousands of scientists for almost a century.
Quote | (And remember ... I WILL become an evolutionist if the evidence is convincing enough to me.) |
I predict this will never happen, no matter how powerful the evidence is (and it is powerful). Your objections to the evidence so far have been laughable (the three you presented most recently are particularly risible), and you've completely ignored the arguments that show how laughable they are. And why would you ever give up a hypothesis that is unfalsifiable, even in principle? We will never be able to prove that a "creator god" doesn't exist.
-------------- 2006 MVD award for most dogged defense of scientific sanity
"Atheism is a religion the same way NOT collecting stamps is a hobby." —Scott Adams
|