ericmurphy
Posts: 2460
Joined: Oct. 2005
|
| Quote (afdave @ Sep. 20 2006,11:36) | Eric... | Quote | | That's a complaint about small sample size, genius. And as if we needed more evidence that that's what you're complaining about, you come back with this: |
Different topic, Eric. The context of Deadman's misstatement that I corrected was the Y-axis of the Minster plot. You are talking about how many meteorites were sampled. Try to keep things straight if you are going to enter the discussion, OK? I have enough intentional obfuscators to keep between the ditches ... I don't need any blunderers to make matters worse. |
Dave, no matter how many ways you try to slice it, you were indeed complaining about the sample size—and you continue to complain about it. That you were also complaining about the data range is utterly irrelevant. It's not a different topic; it's the same exact topic. And it's in the exact same post. You're implying that the ages derived from the meteor do not prove deep time because the sample is too small, having conveniently forgotten once again that one ancient date is sufficient to obliterate your "hypothesis."
--------------
2006 MVD award for most dogged defense of scientific sanity
"Atheism is a religion the same way NOT collecting stamps is a hobby." —Scott Adams
|
