shi
Posts: 80
Joined: Mar. 2006
|
| Quote (Chris Hyland @ Mar. 15 2006,17:12) | | So your point is that the molecular clock hypothesis does not always hold, and some lineages diverge faster than others, how does this refute 'Darwinism' exactly. Like jeannot said, modern phylogenetic techniques do not use it, and they have turned out to be more accurate. Can I confirm that by 'Darwinism' you mean 'current evolutionary theory'? |
I am afraid you have got some major homework to do and sorry I cannot do it for you in light of time.
no matter which theory you have in mind, the current one is still a Darwinism.
|
