RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (14) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Avocationist, taking some advice...seperate thread< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Russell



Posts: 1082
Joined: April 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 27 2006,14:48   

Quote
Behe ... has accepted [co-option] as another explanation but he refutes it is also being extremely unlikely.
Saying, "I think it's extremely unlikely" does not amount to "refuting".
Quote
What random mutations have we observed that were useful?
I don't know about you, but I've observed many virus mutations that allow a virus to better cope with different hosts, different metabolic conditions, particular drugs, particular antibodies...  happens all the time. If it didn't, drug resistance in HIV wouldn't be a problem.
Quote
How do small mutations leading to better sight also manage to randomly mutate the needed nerve pathways and brain and skull reformations?
Are you being quite serious here? Evolution is an iterative process. Mutations build on one another. If one mutation leads to better vision, that presumably is beneficial in and of itself. Subsequent mutations leading to more brain development capable of using the better vision then become favorable, etc. Also, did you know that skull formation is responsive to brain formation? There are in fact mutations that result in severely limited brain development (microcephaly). Guess what! In those cases, you don't develop a normal skull with a tiny brain rattling around in it; the skull forms during fetal development in response to the forming brain.
Quote
I am not understanding why the existence of the Type 3 system makes the flagellum non-IC.
It demonstrates the one system is almost certainly related to the other by the process of "co-option" that Behe has "refuted" by declaring it unlikely. (Personally, I don't have an opinion about which, if either, is more "primitive"; I suspect they both evolved from a still  less complex system. But the point stands: an evolving system can have a series of  selectable functions without the "final" function being selected from the very beginning.)

By the way: you forgot to point out where I called Spetner "malicious".

--------------
Must... not... scratch... mosquito bite.

  
  390 replies since Feb. 07 2006,05:23 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (14) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]