RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Official Uncommonly Dense Discussion Thread< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 26 2008,11:21   

UnderCoverTard?

If this is one of you guys, Ku-Dos.  I've never thought of this.


Quote
I think there is not enough data to make any determination of who designed the designer.

Only when and if we can identify the designer we might have some data to work with in determining the origin of that agency.

The only feature we know of that the intelligent being possesses is that it contains no irreducibly complex systems itself.

So, who’s with me in keeping the question of the intentional designer to ourselves?


This is the unavoidable logical consequence of the IC idiocy.  No slippery slopes!  I love it so!

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
  29999 replies since Jan. 16 2006,11:43 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]