oldmanintheskydidntdoit
Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006
|
| Quote (Richardthughes @ Oct. 03 2007,11:53) | Some great question begging from BA77:
http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....-140071
At least we didn't get his list of "evolution can't explain", which would have been quite apt given what he's replying to. |
And Bourne just keeps on giving
| Quote | The fact that DNA contains error trapping mechanisms implies knowledge. There is no such thing as ‘error correction’ without knowledge. But DNA does not have it’s own knowledge therefore it was designed by someone with knowledge of what proper states are within the genome versus erroneous states.
Only intelligently designed processes can detect error.
The very existence of logical absolutes implies the existence of an absolute mind. Logic is conceptual, not physical. There is no absolute logic without mind.
|
Link
What do you think he means by the "DNA does not have it's own knowledge" line?
--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK
if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings
|
