RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Official Uncommonly Dense Discussion Thread< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
N.Wells



Posts: 1836
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 13 2007,22:08   

Zachriel deserves some sort of award for distinguished service over at http://telicthoughts.com/scifi-and-id/#comments:

 
Quote
#  Zachriel Says:
September 12th, 2007 at 12:37 pm |

 
Quote
   Bradford: If one looks at proximate causes one can construct a case for ID.


What is the proximate cause?


 
Quote
# Bradford Says:
September 12th, 2007 at 12:50 pm |

 
Quote
   Bradford: If one looks at proximate causes one can construct a case for ID.

   Zachriel: What is the proximate cause?

It depends on what you are looking at. One of the focal points I believe to be helpful to ID is the exploration of minimal genomes. It seems to me that IDists would be well advised to consider this an area of research within which varying hypotheses could be constructed and tested much like their counterparts do with respect to abiogenesis. The overarching principle would be the position that a minimal level exists but varies within a range that is linked to the nature of the organism cited. Exploration of proximate causes, that lead to the demise of a specific organism when the threshhold is transgressed because function x is not present, would simultaneously lead us to a better understanding of minimal function. Only then would we be in a good position to assert that gradual, incremental process y leads to (or does not lead to) the minimal function of organism z.


 
Quote
# Zachriel Says:
September 12th, 2007 at 12:55 pm |

 
Quote
   Bradford: If one looks at proximate causes one can construct a case for ID.


You forgot the proximate cause.


 
Quote
# Bradford Says:
September 12th, 2007 at 12:57 pm |

 
Quote
   
Quote
 Bradford: If one looks at proximate causes one can construct a case for ID.


   You forgot the proximate cause.

I did not forget it. I await the reserach results that would reveal it.



 
Quote
Zachriel Says:
September 12th, 2007 at 1:10 pm |

 
Quote
   Bradford: I did not forget it. I await the reserach results that would reveal it.


Okay. Then this,

 
Quote
   Bradford: If one looks at proximate causes one can construct a case for ID.


means this,

 
Quote
   If one looks for proximate causes one might one day construct a case for ID.


Zachriel had a nice use of overstrike, and regrettably I can't reproduce it, so I bolded instead.  Anyway, an elegant deflation of an bogus claim.

  
  29999 replies since Jan. 16 2006,11:43 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]