keiths
Posts: 2195
Joined: Jan. 2006
|
Looks like Orville Johnson is giving his 56K modem (or his anonymous proxy) a workout. But he is incorrect about DaveScot's views on common descent. On December 23, I asked Dave (based on a prior comment of his):
| Quote | | I’m confused. I thought, based on your front-loaded panspermia idea, that you accepted common descent. Or are you agnostic on the issue? |
DaveScot replied:| Quote | | I’m agnostic regarding common descent vs. common design. How can one distinguish between the two? |
(From http://www.uncommondescent.com/index.php/archives/606 )
For the record, it's quite easy to distinguish between common descent and common design, unless the designer mimics common descent.
And PuckSR: Nice scam for getting unbanned at Uncommon Dementia. I hope it works!
--------------
And the set of natural numbers is also the set that starts at 0 and goes to the largest number. -- Joe G
Please stop putting words into my mouth that don't belong there and thoughts into my mind that don't belong there. -- KF
|
