RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Official Uncommonly Dense Discussion Thread< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Glen Davidson



Posts: 1100
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 23 2007,10:10   

Go, Barry.  

Now how was it that you didn't identify cattle bones as having been made by native peoples?  How could you possibly mistake a cow's jaw, which is far more complex than any old arrowhead, as being due to natural causes, rather than as having been designed by the most intelligent organisms observed to date?

And by the way, what is complex about an arrowhead anyway?  I realize that the fracture patterns are indeed complex, but that is simply an artifact of the production method, not "specified complexity".  Indeed, complex stones are worked into relatively simple shapes when arrowheads are made.  

Tell us about this "design detection method" again that Dembski has revealed.  I'd like to know how it can be used to distinguish the many apparent points and blades from the genuine ones, as well as how it differentiates between humans knapping stones and designers who apparently use genetic algorithms and repeated iterations in order to design organisms.

Glen D

--------------
http://tinyurl.com/mxaa3p....p

Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of coincidence---ID philosophy

   
  29999 replies since Jan. 16 2006,11:43 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]