RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Official Uncommonly Dense Discussion Thread< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Zachriel



Posts: 2723
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 10 2006,09:45   

The latest from Uncommon Descent, Lee Spetner responds (briefly) to Tom Schneider

Consider an analogy with a population of words. Suppose a word can evolve by <i>random</i> point-mutation or by <i>random</i> recombination with other words in the population. If a mutant forms a valid word, it is added to the population. If not, it is ruthlessly eliminated. The population is limited to a few hundred of the longest words.

So, starting with the single-letter word "O", a population might evolve like this:

 o
 to
 tow
 row
 rot

Under these conditions, can words as long as even ten-letters evolve in a reasonable period of time? Using Spetner's method, how long would it take?

--------------

You never step on the same tard twice—for it's not the same tard and you're not the same person.

   
  29999 replies since Jan. 16 2006,11:43 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]