Wesley R. Elsberry
Posts: 4991
Joined: May 2002
|
Yeah, I'm not sure what the Bill and Ken thing was about. If Dembski gets anywhere near a courtroom where the topic somehow has "specified complexity" in the mix, my guess is that Jeff Shallit will be on hand. If Bill is talking about Ken Miller, I suspect that whatever court will figure out pretty quickly that Bill's fields of expertise don't overlap those of Ken Miller, leading to the conclusion that Ken's testimony would be considered unrebutted. Shallit's critique of Dembski, on the other hand, would be a direct rebuttal of Dembski's claims from within the field of mathematics.
--------------
"You can't teach an old dogma new tricks." - Dorothy Parker
|
