Ftk
Posts: 2239
Joined: Mar. 2007
|
| Quote (Jkrebs @ July 04 2008,08:36) | Dave writes,
| Quote | | Forrest’s lecture, because it centers on creationism, even though critical of it, is still unconstitutional in public schools by current USSC decision. Any mention of creationism in the public schools, regardless of whether the mention is pro or con, is in fact the teaching of it. |
That is so wrong. Does he really believe this? |
So, Jack, are you saying that it's perfectly legal for a teacher to teach about "creationism" in the science classroom in the same manner that Barbara Forrest does in the public square? But, at the same time, it is illegal to teach ID in the science classroom in the manner that perhaps Dembski would?
| Quote | | And, of course, it doesn't even apply because Forrest's speech was not going to be in a public school, but was rather going to be a public event. |
So, you would have no problem with Dembski speaking about the same issues at said event?
--------------
"Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths" -forastero
|
