Faid
Posts: 1143
Joined: Mar. 2006
|
Dave, nothing could be more absurd than your "butterfly/watch" analogy.
First you ASSUME that both are machines,
then you say that, since they are both machines, their differences lie only in their degree of technology,
and then you conclude that, since their only difference is in the degree of technology,
...they are both machines.
It's the afdavian "these machines are machines because they are machines, and so they are machines" argument.
Circular and tautological at the same time.
Your inanity never ceases to amaze me, dave.
--------------
A look into DAVE HAWKINS' sense of honesty:
"The truth is that ALL mutations REDUCE information"
"...mutations can add information to a genome. And remember, I have never said that this is not possible."
|
