Kristine
Posts: 3061
Joined: Sep. 2006
|
Can you believe that after griping on RFJE's thread I left for lunch, and over lunch I read an article for my archives class and came across - you guessed it - evolutionary theory, natural science, definitions of theory, philosophy of science, positivism, anthropologists and biologists and physicists [oh, my!], and refutations of neo-Platonism all at once? In one paper on archives? (Which indicated to me that I was not crazy for the direction in archival theory that I'm taking. I have every intention of being the next Charles Darwin of archival theory.)
I'm just saying, RFJE and his ICR friends really have their work cut out for them, what with Darwinists lurking in every collection of Lewis Carroll's manuscripts now. We're taking over! You didn't know that the Beast with Ten Heads was reading ten books via Kindle 2, now did you? (Yes, I bought one.) You didn't know that the Mark of the Beast was not a computer chip under the skin, but those innocuous looking library cards, all along!  RFJE reads ICR materials. Do they have ISBNs? OMG! The Darwinists have taken over the ICR! Keep away from all finding aids! And what about those chapters and verses in the Bible?
(I mean, "Moral decay," WTF? These faint hearts who think that living dangerously means adding chocolate chips to their strawberry ice cream wouldn't know "moral decay" if it stole an election, used a national tragedy to bolster its power, and invaded Iraq.)
--------------
Which came first: the shimmy, or the hip?
AtBC Poet Laureate
"I happen to think that this prerequisite criterion of empirical evidence is itself not empirical." - Clive
"Damn you. This means a trip to the library. Again." -- fnxtr
|
