Louis
Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006
|
MMMMMMMMMMM New Meat!
Ok, I'll kick off:
| Quote | | 1. If evolution is an entirely undirected process, there is no reason to expect it to develop anything in favor of a species one way or the other - that's "magic thinking" beyond what anyone could claim of the idea of a Creator. Random chance is still random chance. The idea that some enzymes and such drive whatever doesn't make evolution incleasingly likely, it makes it statistically more implausible as the more detailed the mechanism, the less likely it evolved without intelligent direction. Try thowing a pile of motorcycles parts into a box willy-nilly and see how many times it takes to get a functioning Harley. Secular evolutionists forget that undirected must, by necessity, be entirely undirected. Any intellectual half-measures are just silly, sloppy thinking. |
Bolding mine.
Ok so two boldings, one error.
Evolution isn't random. Selection, specifically in this case natural selection, is the very opposite of random. See here and here.
In fact reading all of The Index to Creationist Claims will help immensely.
Please try to come up with NEW and UNREFUTED objections to evolutionary biology. This may involve you familiarising yourself with what evolutionary biology actually is BEFORE bloviating about it.
HTH HAND.
Louis
P.S. Rather than being greedy, I've left plenty for everyone else to play with.
--------------
Bye.
|
