Daniel Smith
Posts: 970
Joined: Sep. 2007
|
| Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Oct. 20 2008,13:29) | Daniel,
Your argument fails if any example is found. Your responses on the other items were no better informed than what you gave for the Krebs citric acid cycle example. Why spend time trying to demonstrate your ignorance across the board when it is clear enough when looking at one of those? And, of course, the answer to your question on what is in the paper that you were ignorant of when making your uninformed claim is just as wrong as we might expect of an ignorant blowhard. That's a "no", by the way.
Your stated position tells us about your lack of knowledge and nothing else. |
Wesley,
You're right. My argument does fail if any answer is found. So you're saying that science has found the answer to the origin of the Krebs cycle? Fine. I will focus my attention on that. I spent some time looking for a paper that backs up your contention, but cannot find anything that I can actually read online. (All you've cited so far is a link to an abstract). Do you have a link that outlines the basic chemical steps that brought us the Krebs cycle? If not, can you summarize them for all of us here? Thank you.
--------------
"If we all worked on the assumption that what is accepted as true is really true, there would be little hope of advance." Orville Wright
"The presence or absence of a creative super-intelligence is unequivocally a scientific question." Richard Dawkins
|
