RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (2) < [1] 2 >   
  Topic: Waterloo In Dover, Kitzmiller et al. v. DASD< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
FishyFred



Posts: 43
Joined: Sep. 2005
(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 05 2005,09:04   
peach: It was admitted IN THE BRIEF that ID makes no predictions and has no scientific validity. See here.

As for the Scopes quote... I don't get it. Please enlighten me. Spell it out in detail.
    
  43 replies since Sep. 23 2005,11:11 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (2) < [1] 2 >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]