RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (6) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Miracles as an argument for theism< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Arden Chatfield



Posts: 6657
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 27 2008,12:06   

Quote
Erasmus and Arden, what's the point of an image of Budda on a Big Mac bun?  Even if it's authentic, what does it mean?  Again, nothing.  In comparison, what does the Resurrection mean, the Flood, The Plagues in Eygpt, Adam and Eve and the Apple?  Completely independent of whether or not they ever really happened do they have any meaning?  Of course they do and in the same way the story of the prodigal son has meaning even though it was just a story.  I hope you both can see the difference here.


Sorry, I'm still marvelling at the idea that if miracles were all imaginary it wouldn't have any negative bearing on their validity, and that this is somehow a RETORT to people who think that miracles are bogus.

So Skeptic, evidently you think SOME miracles are real, even tho you reject Jesus's-face-on-food miracles. What's your defining criteria to decide if it's the real thing? Should it just be obvious?

--------------
"Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

  
  179 replies since Feb. 26 2008,09:23 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (6) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]