RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (5) < [1] 2 3 4 5 >   
  Topic: The Traveling Twin Takes a Short Cut, Continuation of MG v Demski Thread< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
blipey



Posts: 2061
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 27 2008,00:27   

Quote
Does my understanding become “guano” because I might not know the proper terminology or I fail to appreciate all the subtleties and techniques needed to reach such a conclusion?

Most likely, yes.  Understanding is hard without knowing the subtleties and techniques, though I'm sure you wouldn't agree.  There are not many Ramanujans walking around and even he needed to learn the basics to be a contributing member of the mathematical world.
Quote
would you try to convince me that I am incapable of understanding the need for an actor to be believable just because I don’t know the details of acting techniques?

No, I would say that you are incapable of being an actor.  And it is no stretch to say that without knowing the basics and techniques of physics, you are incapable of being a physicist.  Try not to mix the metaphors.

--------------
But I get the trick question- there isn't any such thing as one molecule of water. -JoeG

And scientists rarely test theories. -Gary Gaulin

   
  124 replies since Jan. 25 2008,22:00 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (5) < [1] 2 3 4 5 >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]