Ftk
Posts: 2239
Joined: Mar. 2007
|
| Quote (blipey @ Oct. 02 2007,11:59) | Nope. That's a pretty good question. In fact, it cuts right to the point of this discussion.
HOW DID BEHE KNOW WHAT WAS SAID IN A SET OF BOOKS AND PAPERS WHICH HE DID NOT READ?
Please continue to ignore this very simple question. |
blipes...it's really quite simple. If scientists are still trying to figure out how the immune system evolved and trying to determine the evolutionary pathways involved, then that would mean that articles from the past do not provide us with that information either. If they did, the current speculation would not be necessary.
I would like to note that conversations like this are what lead me to question the Darwinist take on many issues that I may not have the scientific expertise to *completely* understand. You might remember our previous conversation about my *BS detector*. I also realize that Darwinists come at many of these issues from very, very strange angles.
Also, blipe, you might consider what the general public thinks when they hear about this silly "stack of books" antic. Obviously, this was staged as court room theatre in an attempt to run with it to the media. The books were there and ready to be rolled out. Now, everyone knows that Behe would not have read every single ancient document in regard to the speculation as to how the immune system evolved. But, obviously, he has read more than just the most current papers on the topic. He's been discussing the issue for years.
No doubt he had read several of the articles found in that stack, but like everyone else in that courtroom and probably every scientist in the country, he would not have read all of it, and it *certainly* wouldn't be necessary to support his case.
The whole episode was very sophomoric...
--------------
"Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths" -forastero
|
