The Critic's Resource on AntiEvolution
|
Dossiers | Home | Incidents | Literature | Projects | Public BB | Topics |
Donate | NCSE | PT | TD | TOA | Public BB Archive | PvM's Blog | |
Who's onlineThere are currently 0 users and 1 guest online.
NavigationUser loginFeatured BookDonateRandom Articles
Store |
news aggregatorFifty Years Later, Recalling Walt Disney and ScientismSomeone once quipped that Disney harbored "19th-century emotions in conflict with a 21st-century brain."
John G. West
http://www.discovery.org/p/18
Categories: Anti-Science News
Join Us in Advancing the Case for Intelligent Design -- Give to Discovery Institute Today!By making an end-of-year donation, you can reach millions of Evolution News readers and social media users.
John G. West
http://www.discovery.org/p/18
Categories: Anti-Science News
Royal Society Meeting: What Evolutionists Say When They Think Nobody's ListeningThe event vindicated a major and provocative claim in Stephen Meyer's book Darwin's Doubt.
David Klinghoffer
http://www.discovery.org/p/209
Categories: Anti-Science News
Dean Kenyon and Academic Freedom -- A Case in PointSomething is wrong when a university objects to any probing of the textbook view, on evolution or in any other field.
Sarah Chaffee
Categories: Anti-Science News
NASA on Trial: David Coppedge Fell Victim to Anti-ID Zeal at America's Space AgencyA Team Lead on the Cassini mission to Saturn, Coppedge shared videos on intelligent design with colleagues. Workplace hysteria ensued.
David Klinghoffer
http://www.discovery.org/p/209
Categories: Anti-Science News
Why Do Monkeys Not Speak? Because They're Not HumanOnce, anatomy was assumed to account for their surprising reticence. No longer.
David Klinghoffer
http://www.discovery.org/p/209
Categories: Anti-Science News
Silicon-Based Life: If Scientists Repurpose an Enzyme, Is It Intelligent Design?No living cell we know of produces carbon-silicon bonds, but scientists "evolved" a way to make cells produce them.
Evolution News & Views
Categories: Anti-Science News
Ethics and Embryo Research: Let the Promise-Breaking Begin (Again)I have come to the conclusion that "the scientists" believe themselves entitled to do what they want, in the way they want.
Wesley J. Smith
http://www.nationalreview.com/human-exceptionalism
Categories: Anti-Science News
Daddy and Baby: Evolutionary Legends Die HardA colleague shares this gem from a get-together with friends.
David Klinghoffer
http://www.discovery.org/p/209
Categories: Anti-Science News
Feathers on a Bird or Dinosaur Tail? The Media Are Certain; the Scientific Evidence Less SoA section of a 99-million-year-old feathered tail in a chunk of amber belongs to a juvenile dinosaur. Or does it?
Evolution News & Views
Categories: Anti-Science News
LSU Ophthalmologist Commends a "Design Approach" in Appraising Supposedly Vestigial OrgansSometimes when our worldview is wrong, we miss important things.
Ann Gauger
http://www.biologicinstitute.org/people
Categories: Anti-Science News
Best of Behe: An Open Letter to Professors Kenneth Miller and PZ MyersEveryone is looking forward to seeing your calculations. Please keep the rhetoric to a minimum.
Michael Behe
http://www.discovery.org/p/31
Categories: Anti-Science News
Post-Darwin, James Clerk Maxwell's Views Presaged Modern Arguments for Intelligent DesignOne design inference Maxwell made in this period concerns his famous thought experiment, "Maxwell's demon."
Evolution News & Views
Categories: Anti-Science News
Naval Academy Philosopher: Laypeople Are Entitled to an Opinion on Science QuestionsThe "participatory model" is a worthy complement to Doug Axe's "common science."
Sarah Chaffee
Categories: Anti-Science News
Fact-Check: Austin, TX, Newspaper Bungles Description of Discovery Institute; Reporter Won't Correct RecordAustin American Statesman reporter Madlin Mekelburg could take a lesson in neutrality in reporting.
Sarah Chaffee
Categories: Anti-Science News
Pre-Darwin, James Clerk Maxwell's Design Argument Foreshadowed Modern ID TheoryWe will consider the pre- and post-Darwin views of a genius who helped usher in the modern age of electromagnetic technology.
Evolution News & Views
Categories: Anti-Science News
Behe: Nobel Prize for Chemistry Begs the Question of Intelligent Design"Nano" machines are impressive as technical achievements. Yet they are also exceedingly simple, "cute" but "useless."
David Klinghoffer
http://www.discovery.org/p/209
Categories: Anti-Science News
Evolving Protein-Protein Binding -- Not a Problem?Dennis Venema writes a series of posts for BioLogos called "Letters to the Duchess" -- an allusion to Galileo's "Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina."
Cornelius Hunter
Categories: Anti-Science News
Newfound Genetic Code-in-Code Regulates Stress ResponseDiscovery sheds light on reason for mismatch between codon numbers and amino acid numbers.
Evolution News & Views
Categories: Anti-Science News
Is Evolution Falsifiable? Doug Axe Versus Biochemist Keith Fox on Premier RadioAs Dr. Axe puts it, "Is it possible to use science to show that something can't happen?"
David Klinghoffer
http://www.discovery.org/p/209
Categories: Anti-Science News
|
RSS SyndicationAntievolutionists Say the Darndest ThingsAntievolutionists often express outrage over alleged incivility from those who oppose their efforts to evade the establishment clause of the First Amendment. But they have no difficulty in dishing out the abuse themselves. Here is a sample from the Invidious Comparisons thread that documents egregious behavior on the part of the religious antievolution advocates. One thing that Jack Krebs and I agree with is that Pratt can be likened to an outpost under siege in a cultural war. ... My wife and I just returned from a trip to Belgium. We visited Bastogne where a few brave Americans of the 101st Airborne Division were surrounded by the German Army during the battle of the bulge. The German attack was led by a crack SS unit that took no prisoners. What were we fighting against in Bastogne? We were fighting against a Nazi regime that used the philosophy of Naturalism to justify a eugenics program of terrifying proportions. Naturalism is the belief that all phenomena result only from the laws of chemistry and physics and that teleological or design explanations are not valid. Naturalism is not science. It is a belief system. In the same manner, the defenders in Pratt are fighting against Naturalism, although they may not realize it. Rather than fighting against science, they are actually fighting for science. They are fighting for science that is driven by logic and critical thinking rather than by a philosophy that teaches to the exclusion of all other teachings that we are the products of only chance and necessity. They are fighting for science that is driven by the scientific method rather than science that is driven by a philosophy of Naturalism. ... Rather than using logic and good science to support its assault on the brave contingent in Pratt, the KCFS is using tactics one would expect from those that besieged Bastogne: scare tactics, misinformation and no substantive discussion of the real issues. ... So, we are back looking at Pratt as the bombs fall. The question is whether the Board and the Community will be supported by the rest of us as they have had the guts that General McAullife and the other brave Americans had that cold winter day in Bastogne 54 years ago. McAullife's reply was very simple when asked to surrender: "Nuts!" McAullife and the 101st were subsequently relieved by elements of Patton's Third Army. In the same way we all need to rise up and put our hands together for the Pratt Board and Pratt Citizens that have just characterized the outrageous censorship by the science establishment as "Nuts!" Pro-Science Sites
|