The Critic's Resource on AntiEvolution
|Dossiers | Home | Incidents | Literature | Projects | Public BB | Topics|
|Donate | NCSE | PT | TD | TOA | Public BB Archive | PvM's Blog|
There are currently 0 users and 11 guests online.
Listen Now. On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin interviews Biologic Institute Director Douglas Axe about his response to critics of his peer-reviewed paper in Journal of Molecular Biology. Critics such as Arthur Hunt and Steve Matheson,...
Listen Now. On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin finishes his interview with Dr. Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig on the law of recurrent variation and the problems it poses for Darwinian evolution. Dr. Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig is a recently retired...
Listen Now. On this episode of ID the Future Casey Luskin again sits down with Dr. Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig to continue their talk on the law of recurrent variation and the problems it poses for Darwinian evolution. In this segment,...
Listen Now. On this episode of ID the Future, Dr. Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig sits down with CSC Research Coordinator Casey Luskin to discuss a topic that he has published widely on: the law of recurrent variation. Tune in as Dr....
In a symposium in Current Biology, Andrew Berry's short piece reveals how far we've failed to come in understanding Wallace. Michael Flannery http://www.discovery.org/p/471
All along there has been strong evidence that humans are separated from animals not by a mutation but by a chasm. Tom Bethell
C.S. Lewis called science "The Magician's Twin" for three reasons, one of which is that it often acts like a religion. Evolution News & Views
This is starting to resemble a wonderful Monty Python sketch. David Klinghoffer http://www.discovery.org/p/209
Anything to Avoid a Debate About Intelligent Design: Another Cheap "Victory," if Short-Lived, for the Darwin Brigade
Isn't this pathetic? David Klinghoffer http://www.discovery.org/p/209
Anonymous sources, frantic censorship, legal threats. This is Coyne's version of the scientific method. Michael Egnor
The real burden of proof lies on them. Poor guys! David Klinghoffer http://www.discovery.org/p/209
In 1957 physicist Hugh Everett suggested the that the universe splits into different futures each time a subatomic particle goes one way as opposed to the other. Denyse O'Leary
Jerry Coyne: "... It's Rude to Not Respond to an Evolutionary Biologist Who Writes About a Sign Like This"
Coyne is in a snit because of a sign in the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. Michael Egnor
An article by David Dobbs challenging Dawkins set off a brawl among Darwinists. David Klinghoffer http://www.discovery.org/p/209
There's a method in the madness. Evolution News & Views
University of Washington scientists say they are "stunned"? They should be. David Klinghoffer http://www.discovery.org/p/209
Of course, we've already recommended our list of ID-themed gifts in a variety of media, but what could compare to an Alaskan cruise aboard the MS Westerdam? Evolution News & Views
Dreams of microfossils in ancient Martian lake? NASA smells funding down the road. Tom Bethell
It is very unlikely that the hard work of filling in the math steps will confirm the speculation. Rob Sheldon
Antievolutionists Say the Darndest Things
Antievolutionists often express outrage over alleged incivility from those who oppose their efforts to evade the establishment clause of the First Amendment. But they have no difficulty in dishing out the abuse themselves. Here is a sample from the Invidious Comparisons thread that documents egregious behavior on the part of the religious antievolution advocates.
IDC advocate Phillip E. Johnson:
Gould’s uncomfortable situation reminds me of the self-created predicament of Mikhail Gorbachev in the last years of the Soviet Empire. Gorbachev recognized that something had gone wrong with the Communist system, but thought that the system itself could be preserved if it was reformed. His democratic friends warned him that the Marxist fundamentalists would inevitably turn against him, but he was unwilling to endanger his position in the ruling elite by following his own logic to its necessary conclusion. Gould, like Gorbachev, deserves immense credit for bringing glasnost to a closed society of dogmatists. And, like Gorbachev, he lives on as a sad reminder of what happens to those who lack the nerve to make a clean break with a dying theory.Link