RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (12) < ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 >   
  Topic: Intellectually Honest Christians?, Is it possible?< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
BWE



Posts: 1902
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 11 2007,08:28   

OK, I have to throw my 2cents into that post Lenny,


Quote
The problem, once again, is that you are still insisting upon pushing a window between yourself and everything around you.  You still filter everything through all of the "authoritative" mental frameworks, constructs and categories that you have imposed upon the world (and they come from you -- no matter where you learned them from, *you* are the one who puts them there, and you are the only one who can take them away).


-I think what Lenny's trying to say here is that, by asking that kind of a question, you create an artificial worldview. It sounds an awful lot like a condescending "Sit down my young student. You are here to learn." but I can verify the truthiness of the idea. I can't remember before I could meditate very well but I do remember that learning to empty my mind changed my worldview. I don't know how significant it was but it's hard to imagine not meditating in the morning. In fact, I just finished sitting at my shrine for about 20 minutes. :) That oughtta get the fundies up, eh?

Quote
What you need to do is *remove* that framework.


-the word "need" may be a little strong there.

Quote
Here's an experiment for you to try, Skeptic -- it *may* help teach you how to do that (if indeed you are ready for that), and it will take less time than reading a single book will . . . .


-ready? How 'bout, "Things look different if you know this little trick. It's a lot harder than it sounds at first but if you're into it, you might get a lot out of it. It's worth a try if you're up for it."

Quote
Find a nice quiet spot, and make yourself comfortable.  Now, count silently to yourself, to nine.  Then do it again.  Keep doing that.


-You really should sit with a straight back (not rigid) and cross-legged. Honest, it makes it easier. Also, the nine thing will drive you crazy if you start right off with that. An easier way to warm up to it is just to think about your breath. Be conscious of each inhale and exhale. Sounds easy but your mind will drift. Don't worry, just get back to the focus once you notice. After a while (1/2 hour a day for 7-14 days?) you will be able to see the things your mind is doing and it gets a little easier to tame it.

Quote
Sounds simple, huh?  But, as you will see, it is not.  Your mind will continually intrude with all sorts of thoughts, and you will invariably find yourself not paying attention to what you are doing, and  counting "eleven . . . twelve . . . thirteen".  Every time that happens, stop, remind yourself what you are doing, then do it again.


-Like I said, the nine thing will be nearly impossible for you. Shame on you Lenny.

Quote
What you are learning to do by this exercise is to quiet your mind, to discipline it, and to focus it where you want to focus it.  

It may take a long time.  With practice, though, you will learn how to quiet your mind, and how to prevent your mind from interfering with your experiences by filtering everything through your mental framework.  At that point, you will begin to enter a nonverbal state of awareness in which descriptive words are not only unnecessary, but actually get in the way.  You will learn to look at things and experience them directly, without any need to intellectually categorize or pigeonhole them.  The Chinese refer to this state as "tathata", or "of itself so".  For the first time, you will be experiencing reality directly, instead of mediating it through all your mental filters.  It will be a jarring experience for you.


-That last bit is not mumbo jumbo. It's true. We don't live in the present. We live in our constructs. It's very hard to explain this but we make a little movie of the world and see what we look for rather than what is there. However, meditation can alert you to this dilemma but, unless you go seriously all out, you still live that way. It's just that you can catch your most eggregious constructs. Maybe you could call it expectations.

Quote
Once you are regularly able to produce this nonverbal state of awareness (and you will know it once you've experienced it), then the lesson turns into extending this period of awareness.  With practice, you will be able to enter this state at will, for as long as you like.  While in it, you will be able to look at your surroundings and experience them directly -- a far far more vivid experience than any description can be.  (Being in Yellowstone is far far more exciting than any photograph of Yellowstone ever could be.)

With more practice, you will be able to see directly, for yourself, that everything around you forms a vast interconnecting web, where everything both causes and is caused by everything else.


-That's not how I would describe it exactly.

Quote
Some people refer to that vast interconnecting web of reality as "Tao".  Some refer to it as "Brahma".  

You, I expect, would refer to it as "God".

Whaddya say, Skeptic?  Are you ready to throw away your descriptive Book and experience "God" for yourself . . . ?


-It's definitely worth it but don't expect miracles.

Stephen Elliot,

Don't go longer than 15-25 minutes at a go at first. You will just get frustrated. Also, note my comment about the counting to nine technique.

I highly recommend doing it. Start with watching your breath though. It's always there and you don't have to think to make it go. Just watch it. When you realize that you've gone off into next week's rugby match, just go back to watching your breath. You really will know it when you get there. It's really different.

--------------
Who said that ev'ry wish would be heard and answered
When wished on the morning star
Somebody thought of that, and someone believed it
Look what it's done so far

The Daily Wingnut

   
Stephen Elliott



Posts: 1776
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 11 2007,10:07   

Quote (BWE @ Jan. 11 2007,08:28)
Stephen Elliot,

Don't go longer than 15-25 minutes at a go at first. You will just get frustrated. Also, note my comment about the counting to nine technique.

I highly recommend doing it. Start with watching your breath though. It's always there and you don't have to think to make it go. Just watch it. When you realize that you've gone off into next week's rugby match, just go back to watching your breath. You really will know it when you get there. It's really different.

Cheers,
I am going to give it a go.
My days-off start on Sunday, so I will begin then.

  
Louis



Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 11 2007,10:25   

Lenny and BWE,

Quote
I can't remember before I could meditate very well but I do remember that learning to empty my mind changed my worldview.


I can't remember before I took mushrooms* very well but I do remember it changed my worldview. And no I'm not being entirely facecious about this bit.

On meditation etc. Just checking, as an evil, totalitarian, buzz killing, militant, atheist: is there any supernatural element to this lark of yours?

No? Ok good, go about your business.

And yes, I am being at least mildly facecious about this bit. ;-)

(apologies in advance to psychologists and neuroscientists etc for the following inexpert bits of ignorance)

Experiencing the Dirk Gentlian fundamental interconnectedness of all things, at least for me, didn't require hallucination or even meditation. It required education. As I learnt more about the universe through science classes at school and through my own reading (I too am an autodidact with an IQ north of 150**, but I don't think it's significant! Frankly my 15 inch cock is more impressive. He always gurantees me a good crop of eggs from my chickens) I started to realise that the barriers, boxes, divisions and categories I arbitrarily put in the way of things or put things into were just that: arbitrary. Interestingly I did notice that whilst hallucinating my brain wasn't inventing things, just focussing on things I normally didn't let it focus on, "specks" floating across vision, the way polarised light reflects from car windows or water etc. It was much harder to "discipline" my mind to do what I wanted it to, and by relinquishing that control the enormity of the connectedness of things was brought into sharper focus. Perhaps meditation and mushrooms do similar things, alter the main pathway of brain chemistry for a small while, allowing different focuses to slip through.

The thing is though it's important not to get too carried away with this. As far as we can tell we are real organisms in a real universe, it's best to act like it.

Eh, but what do I know.

Louis

*Well actually I can remember very clearly, but I did notice a change, not in brain chemistry or psychology, but in my general set of assumptions post hallucination.

** Based on IQ tests I did half a lifetime ago. I.e. totally meaningless. Oh but I like to mock the tard.

--------------
Bye.

  
BWE



Posts: 1902
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 11 2007,11:07   

Quote (Louis @ Jan. 11 2007,10:25)
Lenny and BWE,

 
Quote
I can't remember before I could meditate very well but I do remember that learning to empty my mind changed my worldview.


I can't remember before I took mushrooms* very well but I do remember it changed my worldview. And no I'm not being entirely facecious about this bit.

On meditation etc. Just checking, as an evil, totalitarian, buzz killing, militant, atheist: is there any supernatural element to this lark of yours?

No? Ok good, go about your business.

And yes, I am being at least mildly facecious about this bit. ;-)

(apologies in advance to psychologists and neuroscientists etc for the following inexpert bits of ignorance)

Experiencing the Dirk Gentlian fundamental interconnectedness of all things, at least for me, didn't require hallucination or even meditation. It required education. As I learnt more about the universe through science classes at school and through my own reading (I too am an autodidact with an IQ north of 150**, but I don't think it's significant! Frankly my 15 inch cock is more impressive. He always gurantees me a good crop of eggs from my chickens) I started to realise that the barriers, boxes, divisions and categories I arbitrarily put in the way of things or put things into were just that: arbitrary. Interestingly I did notice that whilst hallucinating my brain wasn't inventing things, just focussing on things I normally didn't let it focus on, "specks" floating across vision, the way polarised light reflects from car windows or water etc. It was much harder to "discipline" my mind to do what I wanted it to, and by relinquishing that control the enormity of the connectedness of things was brought into sharper focus. Perhaps meditation and mushrooms do similar things, alter the main pathway of brain chemistry for a small while, allowing different focuses to slip through.

The thing is though it's important not to get too carried away with this. As far as we can tell we are real organisms in a real universe, it's best to act like it.

Eh, but what do I know.

Louis

*Well actually I can remember very clearly, but I did notice a change, not in brain chemistry or psychology, but in my general set of assumptions post hallucination.

** Based on IQ tests I did half a lifetime ago. I.e. totally meaningless. Oh but I like to mock the tard.

I'll prob'ly get spam forever but I had to know. My scientifical sciency measured IQ is 157!!!
Online IQ test and I'm not even warmed up. Of course, they do have things to sell me if my iq is above 130. hmmm.

Louis, nothing supernatural that I know of. (unless you define supernatural like afdavey might)

Meditation and mushrooms do very, very similar things. The difference is that you have to wait to come down off mushrooms. Or LSD. And yes, education adds alot to it but the feeling you had on mushrooms probably will leave it's mark on you for the rest of your life. In a good way. Some people can't handle hallucinogens. They get all wrapped up in their personal problems and, due to the focussing nature you mentioned, they obsess and freak out. I suspect that religion could supply the necessary baggage to make that happen. With meditation, you are in control. It's probably better although I also recommend tripping on mushrooms (I grew up in the pacific Northwest so I had ample opportunities) or LSD at least once in your life. But not if you are prone to depression or shame. That feeling of oneness is life changing and impossible to explain.

As far as being real: yeah, bummer but true.

I still want to know why xian is any better than any other religion and if it's just a method then why you need to call it xian. Seems like the nimrods have capitalized the word. Might as well let em have it.

--------------
Who said that ev'ry wish would be heard and answered
When wished on the morning star
Somebody thought of that, and someone believed it
Look what it's done so far

The Daily Wingnut

   
Louis



Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 11 2007,13:57   

BWE,

LOL The "Tickle IQ test" (PhD certified no less, of course full report costs £8.50). I did it too. I also got 157, does that make us twins? It certainly means I've got dumber since I was 16 (according to IQ tests which to be honest I have never put much store in, although I did know everything in the universe at 16. I seem t know less each year). All this IQ shite aside, which let's be honest is a bit pointless.

I've tried meditation, not yet had much success, the "daily brain" keeps interfering, but I'll persevere. Regardless of any sensations gained it is extremely relaxing. A moment of pure quiet both internally and externally. As an aside learning to quiet my "daily brain" really helped me improve my martial arts. Different story, different day.

As for being real being at least a mild bummer, yes and no! Not for me personally, but I can imagine people for whom it might be. Looking at the behaviour of some of my more god ridden co-speciesists they view reality as a total pain in the  arse. Me? Can't get enough of it. Although the simple fact that I lack the billionaire part of being a billionaire playboy does slightly bite on occasion. There's so much I could do with a few billion......

Louis

--------------
Bye.

  
skeptic



Posts: 1163
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 11 2007,16:06   

Lenny and BWE, thanks for the exercise but I fear my chemistry gets in the way.  I've tried many times throughout my life at meditation and to no good result.  I could never stop the aimless thoughts (especially "man, it sure is quiet!") and I think it's the same reasons that I am an insomiac and not suceptable to hypnosis (tried that too).  But I understand the utility and I look upon those that are successful with something close to envy.

Lenny, I agree that it is up to me as to answering the "Why" question but I think that is also consistent with most religions.  The problem is my answer has to be reflected by my perceived reality.  Unless I agree to lie to myself, which I refuse to do,  my beliefs have to match Reality as closely as possible and in order to make that comparison there must be some framework in place.  The only alternative would be for me to directly experience God which sad to say I can not.  All methods I know or have experienced have been indirect but convincing.  I appreciate you offering another method to make that direct connection but alas I'm broken it seems.

One comment, it would seem that your method and prayer or fasting are very similar.  Could it be that both attain the same goal by different routes?

  
Ichthyic



Posts: 3325
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 11 2007,16:07   

Quote
*Well actually I can remember very clearly, but I did notice a change, not in brain chemistry or psychology, but in my general set of assumptions post hallucination.


how do you know your brain chemistry wasn't changed?

they don't call them mind altering drugs for nothing, ya know.

I do have personal acquantainces that have taken enough LSD to permanently alter their behavior and reactions noticeably.

OTOH, mushrooms made several of my hikes in the Pac Northwest much more enjoyable (even tried A. muscaria on a trip through Hurricane Ridge - it grows wild up there), but didn't change my viewpoints or assumptions any.  

I'd say saying stupid shit in front of people that know better has changed my viewpoints and assumptions more than anything of a pharmacological nature.

anybody who spent time as a grad student most certainly has had that experience, if not earlier as an undergrad.

It's where you learn that many times the best answer to a question is:

I don't know.

It just gets easier as you get older, as when you do say something stupid, you don't get as embarassed when you get called on it.

--------------
"And the sea will grant each man new hope..."

-CC

  
Stephen Elliott



Posts: 1776
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 11 2007,16:24   

Quote (Ichthyic @ Jan. 11 2007,16:07)
...

It's where you learn that many times the best answer to a question is:

I don't know.

It just gets easier as you get older, as when you do say something stupid, you don't get as embarassed when you get called on it.

Touches on something I realised a few years ago. When in a class it can be a tad embarrassing to ask questions on something you do not understand. Certain people are likely to sneer at you, but if you don't understand it is better to ask than to pretend you know.

  
Louis



Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 11 2007,16:42   

Icthyic,

At the time I am certain they altered my brain chemistry. I have the papers to prove it! They didn't permanently alter my brain chemistry because the nice ingredients in psilocybin mushies have long ago been metabolised, and I have never taken enough mushrooms, or taken them frequently enough to do permanent alterations. (That's the problem with being a chemist with a med chem/bio bent, I really do know exactly what's in my drink and I really do know where it's going ;) )

I wouldn't say the mushrooms/hallucinations changed my perspective, I'd say they were part of a process of change that was already well underway due to more prosaic influences (education, my own ideas etc).

Quote
I'd say saying stupid shit in front of people that know better has changed my viewpoints and assumptions more than anything of a pharmacological nature.

anybody who spent time as a grad student most certainly has had that experience, if not earlier as an undergrad.

It's where you learn that many times the best answer to a question is:

I don't know.


Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, and yes! Grad school has been the biggest influence in changing my life and attitude thus far. Hence my comment about education above. Not just from the "saying stupid shit" angle, but also from getting to work with some of the most brilliant people I have encountered. Ironically, also working with some of the most moronic.

Working at a big pharma company has also been a real eye opener, some of the guys and girls there have got to very high level scientific positions though less orthodox backgrounds (i.e. not school, degree, postgrad, postdoc, management etc) and some of these guys and girls are fucking geniuses. No word of exaggeration, they are extremely smart. There was a policy dating from the mid 70s when the pharmas were feeling the pinch of (relatively justified) academic snobbery, in which they set out to recruit future Nobel laureate material. They offered (relatively) huge money and opportunities to high class grads and postgrads and did a pretty good job of nicking some (future) big name people. That legacy shows still.

Louis

--------------
Bye.

  
Ichthyic



Posts: 3325
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 11 2007,17:03   

Quote
some of these guys and girls are fucking geniuses. No word of exaggeration, they are extremely smart.


hmm, totally OT, but all of this (chemicals, grad school, and geniuses) reminds me of the guy who entered my major prof's lab at the same time I did.  We shared an apt. the first year of grad school.

Now, not to toot my own horn, mind you, but I did all right as an undergrad; made the Dean's list several times, finished with a 3.8 GPA and honors in the major, and had published my first paper before i graduated.

thought myself hot stuff when I got accepted into the zoo dept. at UCB, considering it was in the top 3 in the nation at the time.

This guy...

perfect GPA from University of Washington (and i do mean PERFECT), double major, valedictorian.... etc.

He could drink like a fish (no pun intended) all day long, then snort enough coke to choke a horse; stay up all night to cram for an exam... and not miss a single answer the next day.

He set a record time for his orals exam (20 minutes... NO KIDDING) simply because the committee couldn't figure out anything to ask him he couldn't answer.  they even asked him obscure sports questions as a joke... which of course he nailed right off.

Moreover, he could speak 3 languages, was literally tall, dark and handsome (no problems getting dates, that's for sure - I think he screwed every female grad student in the bio dept. over a two year period), and had tons of charisma to boot.

It sure does humble one, let me tell ya.

OTOH, he was a minor sociopath, ultra-competetive, and had real troubles with creativity and relationships that lasted longer than a week.

I haven't heard hide nor hair of him since he finished grad school; to the best of my knowledge, he has never published another paper (other than the one his thesis was based on), and never got a job in the field that I could find (and I'm pretty good at tracking folks down, usually).

He left an impression, though, that's for sure.

--------------
"And the sea will grant each man new hope..."

-CC

  
"Rev Dr" Lenny Flank



Posts: 2560
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 11 2007,17:58   

Quote (skeptic @ Jan. 11 2007,16:06)
One comment, it would seem that your method and prayer or fasting are very similar.  Could it be that both attain the same goal by different routes?

Yes.

As I like to put it, there are an infinite number of ways to climb a mountain.  But once you get to the top, everyone has the same view.

As the book that I recalled from 20 years ago put it:  "Enlightenment doesn't care how you get there".

--------------
Editor, Red and Black Publishers
www.RedandBlackPublishers.com

  
"Rev Dr" Lenny Flank



Posts: 2560
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 11 2007,18:12   

Quote (skeptic @ Jan. 11 2007,16:06)
The problem is my answer has to be reflected by my perceived reality.  Unless I agree to lie to myself, which I refuse to do,  my beliefs have to match Reality as closely as possible and in order to make that comparison there must be some framework in place.

But you ARE lying to yourself, whenever you tell yourself that the religious opinions you follow come from something that is not only external to you, but external to the entire universe.

The religious opinions that you follow come from YOU.  Nowhere else.  And that is true for everyone else, as well, even the most rabid of literalists who thinks he is "following the Bible".

*Everyone* chooses their own opinions.  Our opinions do not choose *us*.

--------------
Editor, Red and Black Publishers
www.RedandBlackPublishers.com

  
"Rev Dr" Lenny Flank



Posts: 2560
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 11 2007,18:16   

Quote (Stephen Elliott @ Jan. 11 2007,10:07)
Cheers,
I am going to give it a go.
My days-off start on Sunday, so I will begin then.

The trick is in not "trying".  ;)

--------------
Editor, Red and Black Publishers
www.RedandBlackPublishers.com

  
"Rev Dr" Lenny Flank



Posts: 2560
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 11 2007,18:30   

Quote (BWE @ Jan. 11 2007,08:28)
Shame on you Lenny.

Well, it's just an illustration, not intended as a course of instruction.

We could, of course, just do what the Zen masters used to do, and teach their students by smacking them with a stick whenever they asked anything.  What a, uh, real thing that smack is.  Reality right in your face.    ;)

--------------
Editor, Red and Black Publishers
www.RedandBlackPublishers.com

  
Reciprocating Bill



Posts: 4265
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 12 2007,21:20   

Regarding hallucinogens, there are caveats in order.  I came away from those experiences (early to middle 1970s) with utter conviction that what I had experienced were "neuroepiphanies," the disclosure of brain structure in vision and other cortically mediated experiences (and much more), and the utter identity of my conscious experience with my neurobiology.  As I remarked in my earlier-posted essay, "nothing could more clearly demonstrate the neural basis of consciousness than its profound alteration through the insinuation of tiny amounts of such a simple substance." There are very interesting models of consciousness (the thalamocortical model of conscousness comes to mind) that are consistent with those experiences.

But not everyone came away with the same conclusions. Others with whom I shared these experiences (or at least the substances that initiated the experiences) emerged with very different conclusions, finding in their explorations deep spiritual significance regarding the immateriality of soul, the reality of repeated and reincarnated lives, and so on.  Stuff I regarded as fairy tales.  Yet everyone was, unquestionably, an earnest and open-minded explorer.  

A final caveat recalls the sober reality that a companion of ours, who similarly frolicked in the meadows of neurotransmission, became quite psychotic, developed paranoid delusions, and required psychiatric hospitalization for many months.  He may well have been vulnerable to developing such a disorder in a way that we were not - but that is hindsight. His earlier experiences were much like our own.  So I would never get into the business of commending these substances to others. Very risky.

--------------
Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be.

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you."
- David Foster Wallace

"Here’s a clue. Snarky banalities are not a substitute for saying something intelligent. Write that down."
- Barry Arrington

  
Louis



Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 13 2007,08:17   

Reciprocating Bill,

Good point. Sorry it was a bit remiss of me not to mention said caveats. I agree wholeheartedly that a really convincing way to show yourself that the mind is a product of the chemistry of the brain is to take a hallucinogen. Or have several beers!

I also agree wholeheartedly that these things are not necessarily safe, especially if one is keen to partake frequently or in large doses. For example cannabis psychosis is a very real, clinically demonstrable effect of large cannabis intake. The difficult fact is that "large" means different things for different people. In the case of cannabis those with a history of schizophreniform disorders or a family history of such, should probably steer well clear. The same goes for mushrooms, LSD, peyote, A. muscaria, S. divinorum,  ketamine, mescaline, or indeed large quantities (2 heaped tablespoons or so in one hit) of freshly ground nutmeg. And no I am not joking about that last one. Nutmeg is a powerful and really unpleasant hallucinogen.

The thing that isn't usually mentioned is that the doses required for adverse effects really are quite large, the frequency really is quite frequent, for most people. Obviously just like those people who lack alcohol dehydrogenase, or who have another biochemical basis for low tolerance to alcohol, there are people who will have adverse effects first time.

This incidentally is one of the key reasons I think drugs should be legalised: quality control. A substantial portion of the acute toxicity issues with drugs is caused by the exciting little "impurities" mixed into the drug for shits, giggles and profit by the nice people who get them for you. Also incidentally, this is one reason I advocate mushrooms as a good first hallucination (if you really have to have one). The side effects are well known, and you can eat the mushrooms in small amounts, very carefully. The worst that can happen in this case is you make yourself very sick (i.e. vomiting etc) and unpleasantly disorientated. In the UK we have a small psilocybin mushroom which you would require ~10 to 50 dried mushrooms to begin feeling an effect. taking them one or two mushrooms at a time over a period of hours might produce a light buzz. As long as one waits for the mushroom to be digested sufficiently (~30 to 40 minutes depending on person) and is cautious in how they manage their dose, it is extremely unlikely that anything can go wrong.

When we are talking about things like drug induced psychosis, we are talking about the longer term, chronic effects of drug taking, and yes these are very nasty and very very real. A single harmless and controlled flirtation with mushrooms for example is very unlikely to cause you harm. A prolonged and high dose use of cannabis is very likely to cause you harm, especially if you smoke it. Just like the occasional night out on the beers is no big deal, but a prolonged period of whiskey on your cornflakes is going to get you an early space in the crematorium. Moderation is the watch word. Always go into anything like this with as much information as you can get and as much support, caution and control as you can arrange, if you have to go into it at all.

Louis

--------------
Bye.

  
Reciprocating Bill



Posts: 4265
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 13 2007,12:04   



--------------
Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be.

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you."
- David Foster Wallace

"Here’s a clue. Snarky banalities are not a substitute for saying something intelligent. Write that down."
- Barry Arrington

  
BWE



Posts: 1902
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 17 2007,00:36   

Quote (Reciprocating Bill @ Jan. 12 2007,21:20)
Regarding hallucinogens, there are caveats in order.  I came away from those experiences (early to middle 1970s) with utter conviction that what I had experienced were "neuroepiphanies," the disclosure of brain structure in vision and other cortically mediated experiences (and much more), and the utter identity of my conscious experience with my neurobiology.  As I remarked in my earlier-posted essay, "nothing could more clearly demonstrate the neural basis of consciousness than its profound alteration through the insinuation of tiny amounts of such a simple substance." There are very interesting models of consciousness (the thalamocortical model of conscousness comes to mind) that are consistent with those experiences.

But not everyone came away with the same conclusions. Others with whom I shared these experiences (or at least the substances that initiated the experiences) emerged with very different conclusions, finding in their explorations deep spiritual significance regarding the immateriality of soul, the reality of repeated and reincarnated lives, and so on.  Stuff I regarded as fairy tales.  Yet everyone was, unquestionably, an earnest and open-minded explorer.  

A final caveat recalls the sober reality that a companion of ours, who similarly frolicked in the meadows of neurotransmission, became quite psychotic, developed paranoid delusions, and required psychiatric hospitalization for many months.  He may well have been vulnerable to developing such a disorder in a way that we were not - but that is hindsight. His earlier experiences were much like our own.  So I would never get into the business of commending these substances to others. Very risky.

The caveats are strangely, 30 years old.

Hallucinogens messed up messed up people. The rest of us figured out what to look for and stopped taking them.

You only live once. Even to a zen buddist. Might as well give it a he!! of a go.

--------------
Who said that ev'ry wish would be heard and answered
When wished on the morning star
Somebody thought of that, and someone believed it
Look what it's done so far

The Daily Wingnut

   
Stephen Elliott



Posts: 1776
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 17 2007,00:42   

Quote (BWE @ Jan. 17 2007,00:36)
Quote (Reciprocating Bill @ Jan. 12 2007,21:20)
Regarding hallucinogens, there are caveats in order.  I came away from those experiences (early to middle 1970s) with utter conviction that what I had experienced were "neuroepiphanies," the disclosure of brain structure in vision and other cortically mediated experiences (and much more), and the utter identity of my conscious experience with my neurobiology.  As I remarked in my earlier-posted essay, "nothing could more clearly demonstrate the neural basis of consciousness than its profound alteration through the insinuation of tiny amounts of such a simple substance." There are very interesting models of consciousness (the thalamocortical model of conscousness comes to mind) that are consistent with those experiences.

But not everyone came away with the same conclusions. Others with whom I shared these experiences (or at least the substances that initiated the experiences) emerged with very different conclusions, finding in their explorations deep spiritual significance regarding the immateriality of soul, the reality of repeated and reincarnated lives, and so on.  Stuff I regarded as fairy tales.  Yet everyone was, unquestionably, an earnest and open-minded explorer.  

A final caveat recalls the sober reality that a companion of ours, who similarly frolicked in the meadows of neurotransmission, became quite psychotic, developed paranoid delusions, and required psychiatric hospitalization for many months.  He may well have been vulnerable to developing such a disorder in a way that we were not - but that is hindsight. His earlier experiences were much like our own.  So I would never get into the business of commending these substances to others. Very risky.

The caveats are strangely, 30 years old.

Hallucinogens messed up messed up people. The rest of us figured out what to look for and stopped taking them.

You only live once. Even to a zen buddist. Might as well give it a he!! of a go.

I can't. Unless willing to lose my job.

  
BWE



Posts: 1902
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 17 2007,01:46   

You can't what... live once?

--------------
Who said that ev'ry wish would be heard and answered
When wished on the morning star
Somebody thought of that, and someone believed it
Look what it's done so far

The Daily Wingnut

   
Stephen Elliott



Posts: 1776
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 17 2007,04:10   

Quote (BWE @ Jan. 17 2007,01:46)
You can't what... live once?

LOL. I can't take halucinogens and expect to keep my job. It does (work) allow me to live at least once though.

  
ke.



Posts: 9
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 17 2007,06:29   

Ichthyic ...I had a roomate like yours once


And don't forget Keed Spills!

  
Mike PSS



Posts: 428
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 17 2007,08:39   

Quote (ke. @ Jan. 17 2007,07:29)
Ichthyic ...I had a roomate like yours once


And don't forget Keed Spills!

Ahhhhh.
Fineas Freak and the Fabulous Freak Brothers.

My brother and I collected those at some time in the past.  Unfortunately, while we were...  ummm... expanding our horizens with friends those issues tended to wander.

Thanks k.e. (or ke., or .ke, or k.e, or .ke.) for reminding me of that comic.  I'll have to look out for those again.

  
Louis



Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 17 2007,09:55   

Needless to say I have the full set of Freak Brothers comics.

Amusing reading, read them far too much.

Louis

--------------
Bye.

  
Reciprocating Bill



Posts: 4265
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 17 2007,10:02   

Quote (BWE @ Jan. 17 2007,00:36)
The caveats are strangely, 30 years old.

Hallucinogens messed up messed up people. The rest of us figured out what to look for and stopped taking them.

You only live once. Even to a zen buddist. Might as well give it a he!! of a go.

I'm tawkin' caveat, not prohibition.  And don't neglect the first, and maybe more important, caveat.

Vis messing up messed up people, it isn't that simple. There is current research demonstrating that some hallucinogens benefit persons suffering disabling obsessive compulsive disorders. And I don't know that we know that it is only those with a priori psychiatric conditions, perhaps prodromal, who suffer harmful consequences.  After all, we are pointing to experiences that often profoundly reorganize experience of oneself and one's place in the world.  Such consequential experiences may not be compatible a minority of otherwise healthy people. And my point above, even if it were true that hallucinogens only mess up messed up people, that we can't necessarily know in advance who those people are.

--------------
Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be.

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you."
- David Foster Wallace

"Here’s a clue. Snarky banalities are not a substitute for saying something intelligent. Write that down."
- Barry Arrington

  
deadman_932



Posts: 3094
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 17 2007,23:19   

Quote
even if it were true that hallucinogens only mess up messed up people, that we can't necessarily know in advance who those people are

That's for sure. I think I benefitted from my experiences, but yeah, I know a few people that became really messed up.
In retrospect, I think they tended to cluster into two groups: the fearful who initially hid or were consciously unaware of their fears/terrors and the fear-less who kept on going beyond their capacity to deal with the drugs.
Because my interest was almost analytically dispassionate, I think it worked out okay (and I did a lot of hallucinogens), but I don't recommend mind-altering in general-- people have enough problems with reality as it is. Meditation and communing with nature seem good for everyone, though.

--------------
AtBC Award for Thoroughness in the Face of Creationism

  
skeptic



Posts: 1163
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 18 2007,07:47   

I wonder if it could be considered ironic noting the path this thread has taken? Hmmm. ;)

  
k.e



Posts: 1948
Joined: Mar. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 18 2007,08:35   

Quote (skeptic @ Jan. 18 2007,07:47)
I wonder if it could be considered ironic noting the path this thread has taken? Hmmm. ;)

I doubt it, have you ever looked at the back of your hand ...I mean really looked at the back of your hand?

I am willing to posit that the great majority of the authors of truly interesting sacred text's on good old planet earth had a little helpful inspiration from the LSD like substances in bread mould and a few other natural substances.

I can't remember the title of the book but if you want to hunt it down, you might it enlightening. Released only in the last couple of years it traces the effect of various drugs on modern authors and analyzes the writing in light of the drugs effects. Conan Doyle opium/laudanum, Freud cocaine (from memory) the beat writers speed, Coleridge opium and so on.
There was also another on the lyrics of the Beatles tracing the effects by Dylan and hemp.

All said, the one common element you refer to skeptic is the transformative experience an adult has that farewells childhood and its restrictions. It is actually a spiritual/sacred journey in its truest sense. And one that too many people today miss out one because of fashion.

Have you ever read Huxley's 'Island'? That might give you an inkling on what I'm going on about.

--------------
The conservative has but little to fear from the man whose reason is the servant of his passions, but let him beware of him in whom reason has become the greatest and most terrible of the passions.These are the wreckers of outworn empires and civilisations, doubters, disintegrators, deicides.Haldane

   
Reciprocating Bill



Posts: 4265
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 18 2007,09:43   

Quote (k.e @ Jan. 18 2007,08:35)
Have you ever read Huxley's 'Island'? That might give you an inkling on what I'm going on about.

Attention!  Attention!

--------------
Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be.

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you."
- David Foster Wallace

"Here’s a clue. Snarky banalities are not a substitute for saying something intelligent. Write that down."
- Barry Arrington

  
Louis



Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 18 2007,10:00   

Quote
a little helpful inspiration from the LSD like substances in bread mould and a few other natural substances


Ah the ergot alkaloids. A favourite group of chemicals. Rarely a witch burned without them.

Louis

--------------
Bye.

  
  335 replies since Jan. 03 2007,21:39 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (12) < ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]