RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (919) < ... 185 186 187 188 189 [190] 191 192 193 194 195 ... >   
  Topic: Joe G.'s Tardgasm, How long can it last?< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 01 2013,16:18   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Mar. 01 2013,16:11)
Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 01 2013,16:00)
Quote (Richardthughes @ Mar. 01 2013,15:47)
 
Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 01 2013,15:44)
 
Quote (Richardthughes @ Mar. 01 2013,15:33)
   
Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 01 2013,15:26)
   
Quote (Richardthughes @ Mar. 01 2013,15:25)
     
Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 01 2013,15:21)
     
Quote (Richardthughes @ Mar. 01 2013,15:17)
       
Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 01 2013,15:03)
information[/a]:

b: the attribute inherent in and communicated by one of two or more alternative sequences or arrangements of something (as nucleotides in DNA or binary digits in a computer program) that produce specific effects See also “Meyer, “Signature in the Cell” page 86

[snip]

OMGD! The merriam-webster dictionary cites Meyer's signature in the in its definition of 'information'.


Editz 4 spellz

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

No, Richie. Meyer cited the dictionary definition to prove that IDists are OK with the common and accepted definition of "information". He then went on and discussed Shannon in some detail.

However you are an ignorant dickhead and wouldn't know such things.

If Meyer cited the dictionary why does your link go to the dictionary and not Meyer?

Oh right, you're a clueless tard who quotemines.

How am I going to link to a page in his book?

And you are a moron who always falsely accuses me of quote-mining when it is obvious that you don't know what it means.

You cite it, IDiot.

I DID cite it, moron- page 86- the wording is the same. Only the part in () is not included by Meyer.

Learn to write.

LoL! Learn how to read

I can read citations, you obviously can't write them.

[URL=http://www.wikihow.com/Cite-So....es]http

LoL! Typical faggot blames me for its FAILure.

Nice job dickhead

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 01 2013,16:20   

Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 01 2013,16:18)
Quote (Richardthughes @ Mar. 01 2013,16:11)
Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 01 2013,16:00)
 
Quote (Richardthughes @ Mar. 01 2013,15:47)
 
Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 01 2013,15:44)
   
Quote (Richardthughes @ Mar. 01 2013,15:33)
   
Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 01 2013,15:26)
     
Quote (Richardthughes @ Mar. 01 2013,15:25)
     
Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 01 2013,15:21)
       
Quote (Richardthughes @ Mar. 01 2013,15:17)
       
Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 01 2013,15:03)
information[/a]:

b: the attribute inherent in and communicated by one of two or more alternative sequences or arrangements of something (as nucleotides in DNA or binary digits in a computer program) that produce specific effects See also “Meyer, “Signature in the Cell” page 86

[snip]

OMGD! The merriam-webster dictionary cites Meyer's signature in the in its definition of 'information'.


Editz 4 spellz

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

No, Richie. Meyer cited the dictionary definition to prove that IDists are OK with the common and accepted definition of "information". He then went on and discussed Shannon in some detail.

However you are an ignorant dickhead and wouldn't know such things.

If Meyer cited the dictionary why does your link go to the dictionary and not Meyer?

Oh right, you're a clueless tard who quotemines.

How am I going to link to a page in his book?

And you are a moron who always falsely accuses me of quote-mining when it is obvious that you don't know what it means.

You cite it, IDiot.

I DID cite it, moron- page 86- the wording is the same. Only the part in () is not included by Meyer.

Learn to write.

LoL! Learn how to read

I can read citations, you obviously can't write them.

[URL=http://www.wikihow.com/Cite-So....es]http

LoL! Typical faggot blames me for its FAILure.

Nice job dickhead

Not really - Joe can't do the basics, makes fool of himself, blames others. Like always.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 01 2013,16:21   

Wikipedia says I did it right

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 01 2013,16:23   

Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 01 2013,16:21)
Wikipedia says I did it right

No it doesn't.

also:

Quote
And wikipedia admits it is not a credible source.
- Joe Gallien, professional retard.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 01 2013,16:25   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Mar. 01 2013,16:23)
Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 01 2013,16:21)
Wikipedia says I did it right

No it doesn't.

also:

Quote
And wikipedia admits it is not a credible source.
- Joe Gallien, professional retard.

Yes, it does. It has the references exactly how I did it.

Heck the way I did it can be found in textbooks and scientific publications.

Richie cupcake- dumbass faggot

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 01 2013,16:27   

Author, book title and page- that is more than good enough for this dump of a swamp

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
JohnW



Posts: 3217
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 01 2013,16:27   

Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 01 2013,14:04)
Quote (JohnW @ Mar. 01 2013,15:42)
I don't know what's happened to Joe.

Time was, he could be relied upon for a regular helping of off-the-wall absurdity along with all the posturing.  (CSI of caek!  High School Creationism Day!  And who can forget the vegan ticks?)  Now all we get is the same two responses over and over again:

Joe Response the First:
 
Quote
I know you are, but what am I?

Joe Response the Second:
 
Quote
Bottom!

Come on Joe, get your finger out!  We wants teh silly!

LoL!

I demonstrated that cakes contain CSI. Don't nlame me for your ignorance.

I don't know anything about HS Creationsim day- never heard of it.

And I can demonstrate ticks on watermelon- all I need is 2-3 weeks of really dry weather.

However, you and your ilk provide plenty of off-the-wall absurdity with your untestable claims and non-existent hypotheses.

Doesn't count, Joe.  You're not trying.

That's old silly.  It's still funny, but we've seen it all before.  We want new silly.

--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers

There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 01 2013,16:27   

Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 01 2013,16:25)
Quote (Richardthughes @ Mar. 01 2013,16:23)
Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 01 2013,16:21)
Wikipedia says I did it right

No it doesn't.

also:

 
Quote
And wikipedia admits it is not a credible source.
- Joe Gallien, professional retard.

Yes, it does. It has the references exactly how I did it.

Heck the way I did it can be found in textbooks and scientific publications.

Richie cupcake- dumbass faggot

Why do you show us with examples, from the source you claim " is not a credible source."?

IDIOT.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 01 2013,16:28   

Quote (JohnW @ Mar. 01 2013,16:27)
Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 01 2013,14:04)
Quote (JohnW @ Mar. 01 2013,15:42)
I don't know what's happened to Joe.

Time was, he could be relied upon for a regular helping of off-the-wall absurdity along with all the posturing.  (CSI of caek!  High School Creationism Day!  And who can forget the vegan ticks?)  Now all we get is the same two responses over and over again:

Joe Response the First:
   
Quote
I know you are, but what am I?

Joe Response the Second:
   
Quote
Bottom!

Come on Joe, get your finger out!  We wants teh silly!

LoL!

I demonstrated that cakes contain CSI. Don't nlame me for your ignorance.

I don't know anything about HS Creationsim day- never heard of it.

And I can demonstrate ticks on watermelon- all I need is 2-3 weeks of really dry weather.

However, you and your ilk provide plenty of off-the-wall absurdity with your untestable claims and non-existent hypotheses.

Doesn't count, Joe.  You're not trying.

That's old silly.  It's still funny, but we've seen it all before.  We want new silly.

Look in a mirror for some old and new silly and for some funny, too.

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 01 2013,16:30   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Mar. 01 2013,16:27)
Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 01 2013,16:25)
Quote (Richardthughes @ Mar. 01 2013,16:23)
 
Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 01 2013,16:21)
Wikipedia says I did it right

No it doesn't.

also:

 
Quote
And wikipedia admits it is not a credible source.
- Joe Gallien, professional retard.

Yes, it does. It has the references exactly how I did it.

Heck the way I did it can be found in textbooks and scientific publications.

Richie cupcake- dumbass faggot

Why do you show us with examples, from the source you claim " is not a credible source."?

IDIOT.

Because evoTARDS use wikipedia like it is a fucking Bible. And I don't make that claim you fucking dipshit. Wikipedia makes the claim that it isn't a credible academic resource.

Dude, you are one fucked-up loser

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 01 2013,16:33   

Yes and Joe goes into swear-mode as he gets owned again.

Also - he admits he thinks the bible is a supreme authority. Nice work Muslim Joe!

Soon he'll skulk back to his blog to lick his wounds.. but then comes the Ronreyness...

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
JohnW



Posts: 3217
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 01 2013,16:34   

Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 01 2013,14:28)
Quote (JohnW @ Mar. 01 2013,16:27)
Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 01 2013,14:04)
 
Quote (JohnW @ Mar. 01 2013,15:42)
I don't know what's happened to Joe.

Time was, he could be relied upon for a regular helping of off-the-wall absurdity along with all the posturing.  (CSI of caek!  High School Creationism Day!  And who can forget the vegan ticks?)  Now all we get is the same two responses over and over again:

Joe Response the First:
   
Quote
I know you are, but what am I?

Joe Response the Second:
   
Quote
Bottom!

Come on Joe, get your finger out!  We wants teh silly!

LoL!

I demonstrated that cakes contain CSI. Don't nlame me for your ignorance.

I don't know anything about HS Creationsim day- never heard of it.

And I can demonstrate ticks on watermelon- all I need is 2-3 weeks of really dry weather.

However, you and your ilk provide plenty of off-the-wall absurdity with your untestable claims and non-existent hypotheses.

Doesn't count, Joe.  You're not trying.

That's old silly.  It's still funny, but we've seen it all before.  We want new silly.

Look in a mirror for some old and new silly and for some funny, too.

Joe Response the First.

--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers

There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 01 2013,16:39   

Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 01 2013,17:04)
And I can demonstrate ticks on watermelon- all I need is 2-3 weeks of really dry weather.



--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
OgreMkV



Posts: 3668
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 01 2013,19:35   

Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 01 2013,15:03)
[url=http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/information]information[/a]:

b: the attribute inherent in and communicated by one of two or more alternative sequences or arrangements of something (as nucleotides in DNA or binary digits in a computer program) that produce specific effects See also “Meyer, “Signature in the Cell” page 86

When Shannon developed his information theory he was not concerned about "specific effects". Shannon was looking for a way to quantify information, regardless of any meaning. Shannon gave us a way to check for a proper transmission (across a communication channel) and storage of information, counting bits. He also gave us a way to figure out the information carrying capacity of any signal.
He did that by linking information to uncertainty and then linking that to measures of probability.
But anyway, that is why Dembski used “specified information”- Specified Information is Shannon Information with meaning/ function. Meaning/ function is observed and then Shannon’s methodology is applied to quantify it.
So when IDists speak of "information" we are talking about specified information. THAT is the information used in and associated with information technology and everyday living. It is also the "information" without which communication would be impossible.

So even Dembski admits that information does not equal meaning.

Otherwise you would have information + information, which is just silly.

Another own goal from JoeG.  Give him a hand folks.

--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

   
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 01 2013,22:04   

Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 01 2013,14:25)
 
Quote (Richardthughes @ Mar. 01 2013,16:23)
   
Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 01 2013,16:21)
Wikipedia says I did it right

No it doesn't.

also:

   
Quote
And wikipedia admits it is not a credible source.
- Joe Gallien, professional retard.

Yes, it does. It has the references exactly how I did it.

Heck the way I did it can be found in textbooks and scientific publications.

Richie cupcake- dumbass faggot

According to joey g:

"Wikipedia isn't known for its honesty and it definitely isn't an authority."

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2007.......ts.html


ETA: From joey's comment above >

Richard Hughes asked:

"Why do you show us with examples, from the source you claim " is not a credible source."?

IDIOT."

And joey responded:

"Because evoTARDS use wikipedia like it is a fucking Bible. And I don't make that claim you fucking dipshit. Wikipedia makes the claim that it isn't a credible academic resource.

Dude, you are one fucked up loser"


Hey joey, you are the poster tard for fucked up IDIOT losers.

Edited by The whole truth on Mar. 01 2013,20:17

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 01 2013,22:59   

Quote (OgreMkV @ Mar. 01 2013,17:35)
 
Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 01 2013,15:03)
[URL=http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/information]information[/a]:

b: the attribute inherent in and communicated by one of two or more alternative sequences or arrangements of something (as nucleotides in DNA or binary digits in a computer program) that produce specific effects See also “Meyer, “Signature in the Cell” page 86

When Shannon developed his information theory he was not concerned about "specific effects". Shannon was looking for a way to quantify information, regardless of any meaning. Shannon gave us a way to check for a proper transmission (across a communication channel) and storage of information, counting bits. He also gave us a way to figure out the information carrying capacity of any signal.
He did that by linking information to uncertainty and then linking that to measures of probability.
But anyway, that is why Dembski used “specified information”- Specified Information is Shannon Information with meaning/ function. Meaning/ function is observed and then Shannon’s methodology is applied to quantify it.
So when IDists speak of "information" we are talking about specified information. THAT is the information used in and associated with information technology and everyday living. It is also the "information" without which communication would be impossible.

So even Dembski admits that information does not equal meaning.

Otherwise you would have information + information, which is just silly.

Another own goal from JoeG.  Give him a hand folks.

From dumbski himself on page 147 of No Free Lunch:    

"To define CSI requires only the mereological and statistical aspects of information. No syntax or theory of meaning is required."

"In particular, the intelligent agent need not assign a meaning to the pattern."

"Neither CSI nor semantic information presupposes the other. This in my view is a tremendous asset of CSI, for it allows one to detect design without necessarily determining the function, purpose, or meaning of a thing that is designed (which is not to say that function, purpose, or meaning may not be useful in identifying a specification, but they are not mandated)."



ETA: Something is wrong. I can't get the link to NFL to show up correctly, even with tinyurl.

Edited by The whole truth on Mar. 01 2013,21:09

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 01 2013,23:25   

And then there's this from joey:


CSI for Dummies

CSI stands for Complex Specified Information

Complex meaning it is not simple. Complex meaning it is intricate. And complex because it contains many parts or facets.

(Wm. Dembski takes that meaning and gives it a mathematical form. He does so, because like Galileo before him, he sees science as incomplete without the mathematics. You put something in mathematical form and then someone else can check it. But dummies can't understand this and that is why I created this post)

Specified meaning something is indicated or defined, in detail. A good set of assembly instructions specifies what part goes where and as well as the order to put them together.

Information meaning it is communicated data.


IOW complex specified information is a term to differentiate between Shannon Information and information that has a specific meaning.

Shannon information does not care about content or meaning, ie it does not care about specification. All the weight goes to the number of characters transmitted..


http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2007.......es.html

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 01 2013,23:46   

Hey joey, you say:

"IOW complex specified information is a term to differentiate between Shannon Information and information that has a specific meaning."

But dumbski, your fearful leader, says:

"To define CSI requires only the mereological and statistical aspects of information. No syntax or theory of meaning is required."


Which one of you IDiots is wrong?

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
olegt



Posts: 1405
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 02 2013,09:01   

Quote (The whole truth @ Mar. 01 2013,23:25)
And then there's this from joey:


CSI for Dummies

CSI stands for Complex Specified Information

...

IOW complex specified information is a term to differentiate between Shannon Information and information that has a specific meaning.

Shannon information does not care about content or meaning, ie it does not care about specification. All the weight goes to the number of characters transmitted..

In that post Joe conflates two different senses of the word information. Let's crack open a dictionary:

Quote

Information:

1: the communication or reception of knowledge or intelligence

2
a
(1) : knowledge obtained from investigation, study, or instruction (2) : intelligence, news (3) : facts, data

b : the attribute inherent in and communicated by one of two or more alternative sequences or arrangements of something (as nucleotides in DNA or binary digits in a computer program) that produce specific effects

c (1) : a signal or character (as in a communication system or computer) representing data (2) : something (as a message, experimental data, or a picture) which justifies change in a construct (as a plan or theory) that represents physical or mental experience or another construct

d : a quantitative measure of the content of information; specifically : a numerical quantity that measures the uncertainty in the outcome of an experiment to be performed


So Joe thinks (or thought) that CSI helps to distinguish information as a message (sense 2b) from its quantitative measure (sense 2d). That's nonsense of course.

--------------
If you are not:
Galapagos Finch
please Logout »

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 02 2013,15:03   

CSI from dummies...

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 02 2013,15:09   

Vintage Joe from that thread:

Quote
Umm you don't have to know me to try to intimidate me.

Also you can leave my name an alleged address up on your blog.

I don't care. It would be like a fly inviting a spider to dinner.

Anyone I don't know that comes to my door will be treated accordingly.

And I would welcome the opportunity to defend my actions in a court of law.



Ooooooooh. Just ask visitors to bring donuts, Joe. You'll be much happier.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
OgreMkV



Posts: 3668
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 02 2013,18:16   

The Friday meltdown is over.

--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

   
olegt



Posts: 1405
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 03 2013,08:42   

Friday meltdown over, Joe goes back to business as usual. He writes another post three paragraphs in length. No one replies. Joe is feering ronery. :)

--------------
If you are not:
Galapagos Finch
please Logout »

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 03 2013,16:35   

YEC Ronrey Joe and UD:

Quote
Mung, over on TSZ:


That is an argument I often use against YEC’s. Their theory demands hyper-evolution. They cannot coherently argue against evolution while at the same time arguing for evolution.


LoL! YECs argue against blind watchmaker evolution producing the diversity of life starting from some unknown populations of prokaryotic-like organisms.

Ya see in their model all the information for the diversity of the Kinds is already present- meaning it does NOT require chance mutations to bring it about. “Built-in responses to environmantal cues” ala Dr Spetner would work just fine, especially given new, open niches.

Ya see YECs do NOT require new body plans with new body parts. They don’t require anything more that what dogs and cats have shown us is very possible.


--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 03 2013,16:54   

joey has reappeared at corny's site:

http://darwins-god.blogspot.com/2013.......nt-form

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 03 2013,16:58   

Quote (The whole truth @ Mar. 03 2013,16:54)
joey has reappeared at corny's site:

http://darwins-god.blogspot.com/2013.......nt-form

So Ronrey..

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
nmanning



Posts: 3
Joined: Mar. 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 03 2013,19:42   

Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 01 2013,16:18)
Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 01 2013,16:00)
 
LoL! Typical faggot blames me for its FAILure.

Nice job dickhead

So, did you ever run for school board?  I remember reading that you were considering this a while ago.

  
Arctodus23



Posts: 322
Joined: Mar. 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 05 2013,00:54   

Quote (Tom Ames @ Feb. 24 2010,12:16)
Oh my god, I have to apologize to Joe G.!

Right there on p. 452 of the Kerry Bloom review he pointed us to, it says that Centrioles are actually little turbines, with a citation to Jonathan Wells!

Wow, Joe, what can I say? I guess you really must have read and understood all those references you gave us from the January 28, 2010 edition of Nature. And they indeed support ID, completely repudiating Darwinism, just as you claimed they do. My profoundest apologies for ever doubting you.

Hilarious sarcasm. What next? Young earth creationism? Ancient aliens? Apollo moon conspiracy? By the way I doubt that Nature has allowed such a nasty piece of ****. WRONG!!!! It is pseudoscience. Why would they let something that violates all of science's principles, it could never pass peer review.

--------------
"At our church’s funerals, we sing gospel songs (out loud) to God." -- FL

"So the center of the earth being hotter than the surface is a "gross
violation of the second law of thermodynamics??" -- Ted Holden

   
Occam's Toothbrush



Posts: 555
Joined: April 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 05 2013,03:26   

Quote (nmanning @ Mar. 03 2013,20:42)
 
Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 01 2013,16:18)
 
Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 01 2013,16:00)
 
LoL! Typical faggot blames me for its FAILure.

Nice job dickhead

So, did you ever run for school board?  I remember reading that you were considering this a while ago.

Awww, I sure wish he would.  A few internet links to some of his more idiotic comments here, at UD and on his own negligible blog would torpedo that good.  Voters aren't too keen on morons who start yelling "faggot" and "assface" every time they disagree with someone, and who would want an argumentative prick like Joe on the same decision-making panel with them?

He'd be laughed out of town, just he gets laughed out of here every few days.  He'd probably end up challenging the whole town to a fight.

So Joe, please run.

--------------
"Molecular stuff seems to me not to be biology as much as it is a more atomic element of life" --Creo nut Robert Byers
------
"You need your arrogant ass kicked, and I would LOVE to be the guy who does it. Where do you live?" --Anger Management Problem Concern Troll "Kris"

  
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 05 2013,05:26   



--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
  27552 replies since Feb. 24 2010,12:00 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (919) < ... 185 186 187 188 189 [190] 191 192 193 194 195 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]